Thursday, June 22, 2017

Why Democrats Lose, and, Will Continue to Lose

Two days after the Democrats suffered defeat in the heavily-invested Georgia-6 race, the talk from the beltway is one of self-reflection and evaluation.  The Democrats have yet to realize their “we aren’t Trump” campaign isn’t resonating with the voters.

The Hollywood left and the New York liberal elites thought they could buy an election in the deep south with their “high-school president” candidate, and once again, the pollsters and the liberal media told their constituents “this one was in the bag”, (I’m talking to YOU Nate Silver).

With the non-stop revolting reaction of Trump defeating Clinton---from the phony Russian investigations, to the rioting in the cities, to the Bernie Sanders nutcase attack/attempted murder of Republicans, to the violent rhetoric, (see Griffin, Shakespeare in the Park)---the American Voters, even the timid moderate Democrats, wants nothing to do with this ugly side of the left.

Democrat Leaders, and their complicit anti-Trump opposition media have pounded the tactics of obstruction and accusations, supplying false/unsourced stories even the non-political junkies are literally laughing at.

To make matters worse, (for Democrats), the 5-0 special election victories, (that have devastated the Left’s long awaited narrative that any victory, [by Democrats], is a referendum on Donald Trump and his agenda), puts the entire party in dire straights when looking ahead to the 2018 Congressional races.  Republicans, (if they have any intelligence), should have a plethora of material---supplied by the vile left---to produce advertising that should decimate almost any Democrat in any “unsafe” or a contested district.

Last night, our President addressed the people of Iowa, (and by extension most of the country), with an optimistic/positive rally calling for a unifying direction, while touting his agenda of tax reform, gutting and replacing O’Care, and building our nation’s infrastructure---ALL JOB-PRODUCING VENTURES.

His emphasis last night was also on protecting this nation, our men and women in blue, and our armed forces who’ve put their lives on the line for all of us.

And what does Trump do at the end? He thanks all of us, THE PEOPLE, for giving him the opportunity to make the country great again, saying: “WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER”  

(a statement you will never hear from the Democrats)

Wednesday, June 21, 2017


A picture worth a thousand words?

Once again, the pollsters and the Media got it wrong. And, the spin this morning is priceless.

Much more here at the Sparta Report.

Update: Tucker Carlson explains why the Democrats keep losing.

Friday, June 16, 2017


You heard the weatherman, there will be NO CHANGE.

Well, that didn’t take long.  Just one day after Congress came together on a baseball field---as a UNITED PEOPLE---the Liberal Press is back to the same old vile and pure partisan politics of all things LIBERAL.

From Mika and Joe at MSNBC, to Alisyn and Chris at CNN, the Washington Compost, the New York Slimes, and the rest of the liberal progressive media are all back to the same old, (and tired), biased lies, leaks, and “HILLARY DIDN’T WIN, SO WE’RE GOING TO SPEW OUR HATE & GARBAGE” for eternity.

Twitter Accounts:

Joe ScarboroughVerified account

Mika BrzezinskiVerified account

Morning JoeVerified account

Christopher C. CuomoVerified account

Alisyn CamerotaVerified account

New DayVerified account

Tweet these people, (or find their email addresses and write to them), keep it civil, and let them know the American Public is sick of their anti-President, anti-Republican trash.  Let them all know, they are not uniting this nation in a common cause, or the common interest of all Americans, and enough is enough.

(note: I’ll be updating this post throughout the day to provide proof that this sick liberal progressive media is contributing to the division of its people.) 


For over seven months, the Russians have been coming.  Today, only one fact is certain, the Russians, (figuratively), climbed inside the Democrat's heads, and they got a ton of help from our own American Media, or, more specifically, the Liberal Progressive anti-Trump Opposition Media.

Already fully armed with the half-baked theory that the Russians had infiltrated the 2016 U.S. Election process, on November 9th, (the morning after Donald J. Trump had handily defeated Hillary Rodham Clinton), the devastated Democrats and their complicit media began their attempted coup d'é·tat, aka, the removal of a sitting President and, his acting government.

What has transpired over the past seven months, (from Nov. 9th to present), has become a national historical embarrassment never before witnessed in a Democratic Republic---where the ultimate power rests in its citizens, equally entitled to vote and elect their representative government---where a duly-elected President's rights of his office is being challenged, no, threatened by outside forces to nefariously and illegally overthrow/overturn the will of an electorate.

But, let me digress........

The Democrats and their complicit Media are playing a dangerous and dirty game---and the people know it.  The Russians are not our greatest danger to our Democratic Republic---the real danger is within our own Establishment who have yet to accept the results of a legitimate election.  Whether they like it or not, Donald Trump is moving forward with his agenda as the President of the United States.  Big things, and big changes are coming ahead for a great Nation and this great leadership.

What's not the Russians.

Thursday, June 15, 2017


A few things stood out substantially after the near massacre of Republicans at the park, preparing for a charity baseball game.

On this day, (June 14th, 2017), the Liberal Media, (and many Democrats), obfuscated from their responsibilities to recognize a serious illness of the extreme left, who have abandoned the reality of human decency, or the respect for human life during the course of political debate.  

From Madonna-let’s blow up the White House, to Kathy Griffin’s Trump beheading, to the New York Times’-approved Shakespeare in the Park depicting the murder of our president, the violent left has crossed the boundaries of a civilized society, while becoming a third world oligarchy, absent of a moral conscience.

While we realize this nation is deeply divided ideologically, the rhetoric from the left has escalated beyond the civil boundaries of political discourse, to a point of actually acting out their disagreements by employing physical violence.

The ultra violent left is perilously devolving into a quasi-terrorist organization with the sole purpose of changing ideologies with the brutality witnessed in third-world countries where bloodshed is the norm.  

The Liberal Media will tell you this issue is about mental illness and the availability of guns, completely void of the level of hatred from the left, condoned by the Media, the arts, and the far left wing of the liberal progressive party, still unable to accept the results of a Presidential Election.

Much like the calling for moderate Muslims to speak up and out against the radical sector of Islamist, (who teach and preach the extermination of any society that does not adhere to their literal interpretations), moderate Democrats---and their complicit Liberal Media---MUST do a reality-check, and self-examination on their own radical wing of their party.

Political ideological discourse is expected in today’s atmosphere, but it must be met with civil debate and/or agreements to disagree.  But, a civilized society must not condone any form of violence in the course of these debates. These actions of the far left radical progressives must not be tolerated or condoned in any form, and it IS the responsibility of the Democratic Party to condemn these actions with impunity.  Making up excuses about the mentally ill, or gun control is a cowardly disingenuous choice in resolving the left’s unstable and unhinged radical wing bent on hatred to the point of violence.

Please, don’t insult us with this disdainful and despicable tactic. 

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Reckless Democrats Jeopardizing 2018 Election Cycle and Beyond

In what's becoming more apparent every day, the Democratic Party is digging themselves a hole on their 2018 Election outcomes and the chances of enhancing their representative numbers---from slim to none. 

Since the day Donald J. Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Election, the party with no message has piled their political chips into a single ill-fated hand, and, after numerous months of investigations and testimony, they're beginning to look downright silly.

Case in point, was Senate Democrats yesterday interrogating the current Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, who purposely agreed to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee---in an open public hearing---to clear up his impeccable name and reputation as a straight-shooting honest public servant. In his opening statement, Sessions left no doubt he was appalled at the, [Comey-induced], suggestion that he participated/colluded with Russian officials to help Trump get elected.

"I was your colleague in this body for 20 years, and the suggestion that I participated in any collusion or that I was aware of any collusion with the Russian government to hurt this country, which I have served with honor for over 35 years, or to undermine the integrity of our democratic process, is an appalling and detestable lie."  

(For the record, the left-wing anti-Trump website Politico chose to edit out Sessions' preface of his tenure with his "fellow Senators")

But this didn't stop Senate Democrats, (who were prepared to question Sessions' integrity as Trump's AG), as each Democrat took their turn impugning his testimony.  The only thing Democrats were interested in, was how and why Sessions made the decision to participate in Comey's firing, and, why the AG was "stonewalling" by not revealing privileged conversations with the President.

In the process, Senate Democrats made total asses of themselves.  Starting with Vice Chairman Angus King,(Maine), and followed by Ron Wyden,(Ore.), Martin Heinrich (N.M.), Kamala Harris (Calif.), these politicians DID NOT GIVE A DAMN about Russian interference in the election.  They were more concerned about Comey's private one on one meetings with Trump, (before the FBI Director was fired), and the conversations Sessions would not reveal to the panel.

And to be perfectly clear, neither Democrats nor the Liberal Lamestream Media appear to understand the concept of privileged conversations with a President. Or, even though they do understand it, they're preference is to belligerently ignore it.

To put an "exclamation" on the this hilarious investigation---a bogus accusation in search of a crime---Senator Tom Cotton put the Democrats in their much deserved place with his time questioning Mr. Sessions:

“Do you like Jason Bourne or James Bond movies?” Cotton asked Sessions during the Senate hearing Tuesday. “Have you ever in any of these fantastical situations heard of a plot line so ridiculous that a sitting United States senator and ambassador of a foreign government colluded at an open setting with hundreds of other people to pull off the greatest caper in the history of espionage?”

Tom Cotton's opening question/statement, (that revealed the Senate Democrat's intentions), succinctly points out the dilemma the Democrats have placed themselves in, in their line of questioning; the omission of questions pertaining to this investigation---namely, did Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions, or any of his campaign surrogates collude with Russian officials to effect the outcome of a Presidential Election?

After seven months of intelligence investigations, (including the Obama-directed FBI investigation), Senate and House committee hearings, one thing is becoming crystal clear---there has been NO EVIDENCE produced by these bodies of any collusion, obstruction, or a cover-up on the part of the Trump Administration, NONE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA---END OF STORY.  Or, at least it should be.

The Democrats have ridden this dog-hunt and their horses into the ground.  As this next election cycle rolls around, it will be the Democrats who will have to defend their actions and false accusations to the voting public, and their outright obstruction in participating in their elected duties to produce legislation for their electorate.  When Democrats return to their districts during the summer recess, telling their constituents, "we found no evidence of collusion, but we did attack the President and his Attorney General while making complete asses of ourselves---aren't you proud of us?"  Oh, "and can you vote for us, since we've done nothing to enhance your life?"

These delusional Democrats and their complicit Liberal Media are still thinking they can remove a sitting, duly elected President, while wasting all of their political capital on a scurrilous, contemptible, and un-provable witch-hunt, never witnessed in the annals of American Politics.

At this pace, the Democrats will be like lambs to a slaughter-house next year, shellacked, schlonged, skewered, and ready for the dinner table.  Please chew slowly. 

Tuesday, June 13, 2017


The Mainstream Liberal Media is frightened to death that Trump might fire Bob Mueller.  Given Comey’s testimony, (and the confirmations that 1), Trump has never been under investigation, [of this Media-generated Russian Collusion joke], and 2), all testimony from both Comey and intel officials that NO ONE HAS INTERFERRED OR OBSTRUCTED these investigations), the question must be asked: Why Meuller and his team of attack dogs?

The biased statement that oozed out of Comey’s face, claiming his sole purpose for leaking his memos was to force the appointment of a special counsel, reeks of retribution and vengeance, not the resolve to expose the truth.

Seven plus months of investigations, and Comey had zero evidence of collusion.  In every Presidential transition, the incoming team immediately begins contacting and developing relationships with foreign governments. Under the guise of the “Russian Election Interference”, Democrats and their complicit media have latched onto a phony conspiracy theory that EVERY CONTACT by Trump’s people as some kind of collusion/plot vs. a legitimate election victory. General Flynn had contacts with Russians---big frikken deal!

There is NO COLLUSION.  There is NO OBSTRUCTION.  The people know it, Comey knew it, hell, even the Democrats and the Media knows it, yet, they took a weak hand and ran with it, thinking they could snare Trump in a cover-up---which never transpired.

The Liberal Media was visibly shakened and sickened yesterday to see Trump’s cabinet members praising OUR PRESIDENT for putting a coalition together that are united in transforming a seriously flawed central government, ending the “business as usual” mentality of the D.C. Establishment, and confirming his mission to return the ultimate power back to the states, and the people. 

The D.C. Establishment, the Democrats, and their complicit media have gone “all-in” with a pair of deuces, while the President is holding a full-house. He’s known all along they’ve been huffing, puffing, and bluffing, and, like the shrewd poker-player, he’s strung the hand out to capture the huge pot of chips, snaring his adversaries and political enemies in a game they thought was “fixed” in their favor.  

The Democrats played dirty.  The Media played dirty. Together, they've plotted to overthrow a sitting and duly-elected President employing every dirty trick in their book---and they still lost.......again.

It's almost not fair.  

Wednesday, June 7, 2017


Gallup vs. Pew

The Washington Examiner has a story out suggesting Democrats are “poised for huge election wins” based on Party Affiliation.  Of course the Examiner bases their story on a recent Gallup Poll showing---ready for this---a four-point drop in overall Republican Party affiliation, since December 16th.  Of course, Gallup only polls Republicans and Democrats, leaving out unaffiliated independents who voted for Trump.  In the poll, Gallup does point out the Democrats “affiliation” has not grown, only that Republicans have dropped. 

Given the plethora of the Mainstream Media’s all out assault on the President, and the non-stop drumbeat of the Fake Trump/Russian/Collusion bullshit, it’s no wonder Gallup found their desired narrative, or that the Examiner regurgitated it.

But, take heart.  Justin Haskins at the Blaze reported a Pew Research Poll that completely conflicts with Gallup’s “summation”:

Study suggests Democrats could be in big trouble in 2018 ~ Justin Haskins Jun 4, 2017 5:50 pm

“A new study produced by the Pew Research Center has found that from December 2015 to March 2017, voters in a key voting demographic were more likely to remain loyal to the Republican Party than people who identified as Democrats were.

According to the study, released on May 17, 86 percent of Americans in the 50-64 demographic continuously identified themselves as Republican from December 2015 to March 2017. Only 72 percent of Democrats in the same demographic continuously remained tied to that party. According to the study, 10 percent of Democrats aged 50-64 stopped identifying as part of the Democratic Party at some point but returned, while 14 percent switched to the Republican Party and did not return. The results showed nearly identical results for Democrats and Republicans in the 30-49 demographic and the 65 and older demographic.”

So, there you have it---two polls, two different narratives/perspectives.  It’s not really difficult to admit Trump’s numbers have fallen since his victory---4-6 points, depending on who’s polling---nor is it difficult to understand who’s driving his numbers down.  The GOP-E (ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS) are frightened to death to hitch their wagons to the President, his agenda, or his policies, and most of us know they’re directly responsible for hindering the progress, specifically, the "do nothing" Republican-controlled U.S. Senate.  

Yes, I'm talking to you, Mitch!  You and your directionless "leadership" are becoming a joke.  And, the people are not blind to your feckless leadership and cowardly resolve to NOT PASS LEGISLATION.

And, make no mistake, the Ryan-controlled House is just as complicit as the Senate in not moving Trump's---AND THE PEOPLE'S---agenda forward.

It's bad enough that we, THE PEOPLE, have to put up with the Liberal Media's, and the Democrat's daily assaults on our President---that was expected.  But, for Republicans and Conservatives to watch their own representatives turn their backs on Mr. Trump is reprehensible.  

I'd wager if faithful Donald Trump supporters were polled with the simple question: "How do you feel your Party is doing in accomplishing the goals and agenda of President Trump's campaign promises?", the overwhelming result would be "severely disappointed". 
I'll post the results and percentages as soon as they develop.

Note: Please feel free to leave a "disqus-friendly" comment below this post---keep it civil. 

Monday, June 5, 2017

Rov’s Monday Musings……

In the “no evidence” department:

Susan Rice: There’s no evidence that Trump’s travel ban will keep Americans safe.  (Seriously Susan?  You mean like the “no evidence” of a terrorist attack in Benghazi?  Are we supposed to wait until there is evidence that a JV team made it to our soil?  BTW, I’m waiting for the liberals to have a “hug a terrorist” week, after all, all they need is love.

Edit: To be fair, Susan Rice’s statement was “a Muslim ban will not make the U.S. safer”, which again is the liberal’s way of twisting narratives to suit their purpose*.  No where in Trump’s second EO is the word Muslim, yet the media and Democrats hammer the “Muslim Ban” as if it’s written in the Ten Commandments.

* Case in point, since Mr. Trump’s removal of this nation’s obligation to the Paris Climate Accord, the bullshit media has been endlessly promoting the idea that Trump, (and Republicans), think “Climate Change” is a hoax.  Yet the cowardly media WON’T even go near the actual debate/argument about AGW, ie man-made impact on the globe, obviously, because they know their “data” is seriously flawed. 

In the Sensitivity Training department:

TBS edits out “by terrorist” in letter Marty writes to Doc in Back to the Future.

And, talk about “sensitive”, have the Brits released the names of the terrorist----YET?  Or, could they be of some sort of Muslim decent?

In the “show me some dirt” department:

“Do you have something damaging on our president?” Ms. Kelly asked the Russian leader, who listened to a translator through an earpiece.

“This is just another load of nonsense. Where would we get this information from? Why, did we have some special relationship with him? We didn’t have any relationship at all. There was a time when he used to come to Moscow. But you know, I never met with him,” Mr. Putin replied.

“We have alot of Americans who visit us. Right now, I think we have representatives from a hundred American companies that have come to Russia. Do you think we’re gathering compromising information on all of them right now or something? Have you all lost your senses over there?” Mr. Putin asked.

(At this point, Kelly could have said: “Well, yes, Mr. Putin, as a matter of fact, we’ve, [the liberal media] have indeed lost all of our senses since November 8th” or, “My hatred for the President runs deep Vladdy, but that’s another story, what I want from you now is some solid dirt”)

In the “yeah, but LBJ had a triple-double too” department:

As the Warriors went up 2-0 in the NBA Finals thumping the Cavs 132-113.  Also mentioned: KD going to the Warriors diminishes his first “possible” Championship Ring---by joining an already power-house team---a credible argument, but does anyone think Durant cares?

Tuesday, May 30, 2017


Sources say there’s a big shake-up happening at CNN. Zucker reportedly wants more Russia stories---demands back-channels.

Sources say CNN’s top reporters are seeking back-channels with Russian govt. officials---”just make something up” reportedly heard by intel officials who asked to remain anonymous.

Sources say Susan Rice un-masked names of prominent journalist who were colluding with Russian officials to create dirt on President Trump.

Sources say Russian “derogatory statements” are made up to defame Trump and stall his programs.  Sources, (who’ve asked to remain anonymous), also say CNN knows the information are fabrications, but ran with their stories to feed their lemmings who supported Hillary Clinton.

Sources say MSNBC and CNN are frustrated that none of the leaks bleeding out of the intel community have proved any Trump/Russian Collusion.

Reporting for CNN, Susan Hennesy says: Back-channels are “covert operations”----sources say she’s certain her convictions are legitimate, despite the lack of facts.

See how this works?

Note: unlike the Mainstream Liberal Anti-Trump Media, (who make things up on a daily basis and back them all up with un-named sources), this post is a total fabrication of events. I have no intention, (nor do my "sources") of slandering professional Networks or Journalist who are just doing their jobs to inform the public. (insert extreme sarcasm) Unlike the MSM, I have no agenda, other than to inform my readers that publishing stories completely based on un-sourced sources has become a parody of insanity, and not worth reading. Professional Journalism is dead.

Comments, (provided by the Disqus System) are welcome.

Update: From more "reliable" sources:

Breaking!  Liberal Media endorsing removal of Washington from Mt. Rushmore----insist he killed British ancestors.  Sources say they have documents proving Washington intended to wipe out a race of over-taxing monarchist in a revolutionary tactic designed by his treasonous and seditious friends, (also known as the Founding Fathers), to overthrow an acting government.  Sources also say Washington was overheard saying he intended to make America Great Again and he may have intentionally colluded with Russians for support. 

Sunday, May 28, 2017


In Loving Memory:

My father, (who passed away in 1986), landed at Guadalcanal as a U.S. Marine Corporal and “made it” through the first month basically unscathed.  Over the years, he would say little to his family about this landing or the battles that ensued.  Later in life, my uncle told me he had lost his best friend shortly after the initial landing and witnessed many of his fellow Marines never getting off the beach and the jungle fighting was intense.

“Japanese troops landed on Guadalcanal on July 6, 1942, and began constructing an airfield there. On August 7, in the Allies’ first major offensive in the Pacific, 6,000 U.S. Marines landed on Guadalcanal and seized the airfield, surprising the island’s 2,000 Japanese defenders. Both sides then began landing reinforcements by sea, and bitter fighting ensued in the island’s jungles.”

In six separate Naval battles around the island, the Japanese had deployed 36,000 reinforcements, while the U.S. Navy managed to deploy 44,000 and eventually overwhelmed their enemies.  The Japanese exited the island in February of 1943 with only 12,000 remaining troops “while the Americans sustained 1,600 killed, 4,200 wounded, and several thousand dead from malaria and other tropical diseases.”

Not long after this initial landing, my father caught a severe case of malaria and was transferred/hospitalized in Sidney, Australia for a long bout of recovery/rehabilitation.  He would later speak about the kindness and admiration the Aussie’s had for the American soldier.

Shortly after the war in the Pacific was coming to an end, my father was offered $5000 to re-up and report to Korea in that conflict.  He turned down that offer, came home, and began courting my mother. They married in (insert date), and produced six wonderful children, (including one handsome Spartan).  At 91, mom is still with us, and you can’t get her off the dance floor at weddings or parties.

I am proud, grateful, and thankful for my father’s service to our country, and that he made it home in one piece, while many of his fellow jarheads made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of this great Nation. They are, and forever will be my heroes.

Saturday, May 20, 2017


(Editor’s note:  Because of the extensive length, this article will be posted in 2-3 parts, if necessary.  Part one will cover the day of the 2016 Presidential Election forward to the current status of this Presidency. (I’m certain there’s much left out, and I reserve the privilege to insert “other material” or links as needed, and will note the edits at the bottom of each post).  In part two, I will attempt to expand on how much today’s all-out assault on this President completely differs from the resignation of President Nixon, where there are far more "players" than just Woodward and Bernstein. And, there is no cover-up of a criminal action.  There is, however a strong possibility that this whole Trump/Russian/Collusion Conspiracy was created by "Hillary's men". Part three will cover the ramifications and the responsibilities that will be placed on the offending party, “if” and when the truth comes to light that Hillary Clinton’s loss did indeed produce a WITCH-HUNT, not witnessed in modern times, by the Democratic Party, the Washington Establishment, and the Mainstream Liberal Media in an attempt to discharge a sitting U.S. President.)


In one of the most stunning upsets in U.S. Presidential Elections, (especially to the Democratic Party and the Liberal Media), Donald J. Trump defeated Hillary Clinton to become the 45th President on November 8th, 2016.  From that day forward, the left has yet to come to terms with the election results by 1) calling for numerous election recounts, and attempting to literally invalidate/steal electoral college votes---all that proved futile, and 2) founded/created a boogeyman to explain their candidate’s loss.  It must be noted that President Trump defeated candidate Clinton in the Electoral College 304-227.  Out of 3,141 counties in the U.S., Trump won 3,084 to Clinton's 57.  Hillary Clinton did win the popular vote, (including the illegal votes, which will not be covered in this story)

The Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!

In total shock of the election results, (and, the so-called Russian interference/meddling in the process), the Democrats, the D.C. Establishment, and their complicit Media, have mounted a campaign to remove a sitting, and duly-elected President.  At the premise of their campaign---Donald Trump and the Russian Government Colluded to defeat Hillary Clinton.  Not to be left out of this equation/campaign, on December 9th, outgoing President Barack Obama ordered the Intelligence Community to open a full investigation into the Russian’s involvement.  Later, Obama would revise an intelligence sharing method by an executive order. 

The United States Intelligence Community, a federation of 16 separate United States government agencies that work separately and together to conduct intelligence activities is headed by the Director of National Intelligence, DNI, who, at the time was James Clapper. (John Brennan was also involved as the Director of the CIA)

On January 6th Clapper and the Intelligence Community released a declassified version of their report/findings that confirmed Russian interference, but no actual compromise of voting machines or the election process/results.  The IC’s report also indicated the Russian Government “developed a preference” for Trump:

“We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump,” the report said. 

With this “new information”, the Democrats, the D.C. Establishment, and their complicit Media believed they had their “smoking gun”, stretching out the report to conclude/surmise that the favoritism towards Mr. Trump MUST MEAN COLLUSION.  How the hell they arrived at this assumption or the validity of it, is at the very heart of their conspiracy theory---interference, collusion, and now the big one, a cover-up.

Under further pressure from the left, (and the full weight of the Democrats, the D.C. Establishment, and their complicit Media---which, from this point on, I will refer to as the “ATOM”: Anti-Trump Opposition/Media---the Republican-controlled House & Senate have opened investigation committees to look into the extent of the Russian involvement in an American election, including “if” the Trump Campaign directly colluded with the Russian Government to facilitate Trump’s victory.

It must be noted, that shortly following the release of the DNI report, CIA Director James Clapper said in an on-camera interview and in testimony before a Senate Select Committee, that, to date, he found NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government. On May 8th, the Washington Examiner released this report:  

"James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

On NBC weeks earlier, Clapper said, "We did not include any evidence in our report, and I say, 'our,' that's NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence, that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report."

Yet on May 13th, CNN posted this alternative/fake news story:

"James Clapper on collusion between Russia, Trump aides: There could be evidence"

With Attorney General Jeff Sessions prematurely recusing himself, (under pressure from the left, because Sessions had actively campaigned with Mr. Trump), the Department of Justice essentially hand-cuffed themselves, but the FBI and the NSA were fully involved.

Around the 20th of March, during testimony at a congressional hearing FBI Director James Comey confirmed there was an ongoing investigation into Russian interference, but did not, and would not specify or confirm there was an investigation on President Trump.

During the final days of the Obama administration, Barack Obama issued an executive order that expanded the powers of the NSA---the sharing of intelligence information among the other 16 intelligence agencies:

"The new rules were issued under section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333 after approval by two Obama Administration officials: Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Director of National Intelligence Director, James Clapper." (link)

The ensuing dissemination of "intelligence" unleashed an unprecedented volley of leaks within the Obama administration, and continues unabated to this day.

On the 9th of May, President Trump fires FBI Director James Comey for a plethora of reasons, (the least of which is his constitutional right to do), and the ATOM goes bizzerk. Despite the hypocrisy of the Democrat's call for Comey's removal shortly after Clinton's loss, suddenly, the narrative changes to "how dare this President perform his executive right while under investigation", (an accusation that to date, has yet to be confirmed or substantiated).  The faux outrage that ensued was wall to wall indignation, and the leaks poured out of the Trump White House like a worn out dam.

Enter, The Washington Post & The New York Times, aka the anti-Trump opposition Media…………  

Though a series of leaks, (much of it both classified and illegally transferred), the Washington Post and the New York Times began publishing stories in the vain of Watergate---complete with unverified and unsourced material---accusing the President of everything from obstruction of justice to high crimes and misdemeanors.  The "stories" became so intense, some in the Democratic Party were calling for impeachment with still NO EVIDENCE:

No Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion... James Clapper (DNI)

No Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion... James Comey (FBI)

No Definitive Proof Of Any Trump-Russia Connection... Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA)

No Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion... Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)

No Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion... Senator Chris Murphy (D-FL)

No Evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion... Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)

In an extensive editorial opinion, (written by the Wall Street Journal and titled: Comey’s Deserved Dismissal), the WSJ lays out the many reasons for Comey's dismissal:

"President Trump fired James Comey late Tuesday, and better now than never. These columns opposed Mr. Comey’s nomination by Barack Obama, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Director has committed more than enough mistakes in the last year to be dismissed for cause.

Mr. Trump sacked Mr. Comey on the advice of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, a former U.S. Attorney with a straight-up-the-middle reputation who was only recently confirmed by the Senate. In a memo to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Mr. Rosenstein cited Mr. Comey’s multiple breaches of Justice Department protocol in his criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified material.

The FBI isn’t supposed even to confirm or deny ongoing investigations, but in July 2016 Mr. Comey publicly exonerated Mrs. Clinton in the probe of her private email server on his own legal judgment and political afflatus. That should have been the AG’s responsibility, and Loretta Lynch had never recused herself."

“It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement,” Mr. Rosenstein wrote. “The Director now defends his decision by asserting that he believed Attorney General Loretta Lynch had a conflict. But the FBI Director is never empowered to supplant federal prosecutors and assume command of the Justice Department.”

Mr. Rosenstein added that at his July 5 press appearance Mr. Comey “laid out his version of the facts for the news media as if it were a closing argument, but without a trial. It is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do. (all emphasis mine)

With the firing of James Comey, and the unsubstantiated, (sources that may never be revealed) reports that the President "told Comey to back off on investigating General Flynn", Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein makes the move to appoint a Special Counsel to take over the investigation of Russian influence in the Presidential Election.  

From The Hill:

"The Justice Department has appointed former FBI director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate Russia's involvement in the U.S. election, a momentous step that darkens the legal cloud hanging over President Trump’s White House.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced the appointment of Mueller, a former prosecutor who served 12 years at the helm of the FBI and is respected on both sides of the aisle.

"My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination. What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command."  (link) (again, all emphasis's are mine)

While the Hill’s Katie Bo Williams contends, (fictitiously), that the appointment "darkens a legal cloud" over this White House, it can, and will be debated among the pundits if the appointment brings about a positive and focused investigation that could benefit the President, or produces nightmares, if the investigation stretches beyond the scope of Mueller's directives stated above.

Currently, it is all understood perfectly where Mr. Trump stands on this issue:

Saturday, May 6, 2017


In the non-stop attempt to delegitimize President Trump with fabricated stories, or refusing to report actual facts, the Opposition Anti-Trump Media has decided to not air Mr. Trump's first campaign ad since his victory over Hillary Clinton.  It appears the Democrat's "owned media" doesn't care to be labeled FAKE NEWS:

How did the Mainstream Liberal Media react to this ad? Sadly, to get at the heart of the story, one has to read an overseas online media:

"Donald Trump's ongoing feud with TV networks not named 'Fox News' has clicked into a new gear as ABC, CBS and NBC have all joined CNN in refusing to run an ad from the president's re-election campaign committee.

The ad shows hosts from all four networks under a banner that reads 'FAKE NEWS.'

It's the Trump campaign's first commercial since winning the White House, and although it is three years out from the next election, it declares the nation has 'rarely seen such success.'

The ad blasts the 'fake news' media for failing to see things that way – and includes CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Also included are MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and Andrea Mitchell, CBS's Scott Pelley and ABC's George Stephanopoulos in its rogues gallery."

Via AOL:

"Apparently, the mainstream media are champions of the First Amendment only when it serves their own political views," Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law and campaign consultant, said in a statement Friday.

"Faced with an ad that doesn't fit their biased narrative, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC have now all chosen to block our ad. This is an unprecedented act of censorship in America that should concern every freedom-loving citizen," she added.

In statement on Tuesday, CNN said it had no problem airing the ad if the network agrees to remove the offending graphic. "CNN requested that the advertiser remove the false graphic that the mainstream media is 'fake news,'" the cable channel said. "The mainstream media is not fake news, and therefore the ad is false and per policy will be accepted only if that graphic is deleted."

NBC issued its own statement saying that,"Consistent with our policies, we have agreed to accept the ad if the inaccurate graphic — which refers to journalists as 'fake news' — is corrected."

Got that folks?  It's a "false graphic" and must be corrected, revised, or otherwise EDITED to be considered for airing on these fake news outlets.

Never mind that since the early morning hours of November 9th, these "protectors of the first amendment" have mounted a FALSE CAMPAIGN of their own with the non-stop accusation that the Trump Campaign Colluded with the Russian Government to defeat Hillary.

CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post---all extreme left-wing news media outlets---still can't come to the conclusion there was no collusion.  Case in point is this live interview between CNN's Wolf Blitzer and Diane Feinstein:

"After months of accusations about President Donald Trump colluding with Russian officials in the run up to the 2016 election, leading Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Wednesday there is no evidence to support the claim.

Appearing on CNN, the California lawmaker was asked by Wolf Blitzer if Democrats have evidence that there was in fact collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russia during the campaign and without hesitating, Feinstein said they do not.

“Not at this time,” Feinstein said.

The bluntness of her answer prompted  Blitzer to reply, “Well, that’s a pretty precise answer.”

Precisely Mr. Blitzer---THERE IS NO EVIDENCE---because the entire "story" was made up in the minds of a liberal media still in complete denial that Donald J. Trump is the 45th President of the United States.

You want to lose the label of FAKE NEWS? Start by not reporting FAKE NEWS.

Friday, May 5, 2017

House Passes ObamaCare Replacement Bill

In a fourth quarter comeback, of sorts, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act on a 217-213 vote.  As expected, not one Democrat voted for the bill as 20 nervous moderate Republicans joined the Democrats in voting no.  Just six weeks earlier the bill was pulled from the floor for lack of support, but several revisions/amendments to cover people with pre-existing conditions moved just enough Republicans into the "yes" column to get the bill into the end zone and on to the Senate

President Trump, along with VP Pence, and Speaker Paul Ryan, addressed a cheerful crowd of Republicans in the Rose Garden, saying “And this is, make no mistake, this is a repeal and replace of Obamacare.”

The Death of a Federally Mandated Tax

As the Democrats in the House frog-marched their representatives to the floor attacking the Republican plan, not one would admit that ObamaCare was a complete failure.  Indeed, the claim that ACA "was not a tax" on Americans proved to be a fabrication as Supreme Court Justice Roberts did his own revision on the "deemed policy", officially claiming it was a tax, and not a mandate, that could have over-turned the bill.

Not to be outdone, (in providing fabrications/lies), the Democrats and the Liberal Media immediately began their campaign of "winners and losers", regurgitating the CBO score from the original bill, claiming 24 million would lose their coverage, (by 2026)---14 million next year alone.

What the idiots failed to explain to their audience was the fact that most of the provisions in AHCA won't take effect until 2019, meaning 14 million will lose their coverage UNDER OBAMACARE.

The possible end/repeal of ObamaCare has ONLY passed its first phase, with the Senate now taking up the policy, and then onto the Conference Committee, long before it gets to Mr. Trump's desk.  But, make no mistake, the Democrats and their complicit anti-Trump Liberal Media will spread their lies far a wide on what the final legislation will look like.

Yet, one of the many lies made by Mr. Obama himself, may be coming to an end:

$2,500 savings per family and keeping your doctor? This is not a tax?  Your premiums will go down? Not under the nightmare of ObamaCare.

Repeal and replace?  We shall see.

Saturday, April 29, 2017

Noticeable Memes & Narratives from the Opposition Media

Have you noticed how the liberal media is cheering that ObamaCare has not (yet) been repealed & replaced because it’s a “loss” for Trump, not because O’Care is in an irreversible death spiral as premiums deductibles continue to skyrocket leaving O’Care unaffordable?

Have you noticed how the liberal media insist Trump’s tax plan must be “revenue neutral”, as if they cared about debts and deficits during Obama’s 8-trillion rein of debt?

Have you noticed how “quickly” the liberal media took the name of Neil Gorsuch out of the news cycle after the newest Supreme Court justice was sworn into office?  Or, how much the name of Harry Reid was invoked, (by Republicans), as a reminder that elections do indeed have consequences?  

Have you noticed how the liberal media hates the term “Pocahontas”, (falsely claiming it’s racist), while NEVER reporting how the fraud Elizabeth Warren achieved her stature by falsely claiming she was an American Indian?

Have you noticed how the liberal media submits that President Trump has signed little “significant” legislation, (28 bills actually signed), while NEVER reporting that Democrats---in both the House and Senate---have refused to participate in the legislative process, except when they can stall or hold up Trump appointments to his administration?

Have you noticed how the liberal media’s “still unsubstantiated” narrative/accusation [that the Trump Campaign Colluded with the Russian Government to elect our President], has fallen off the front pages since it’s becoming apparent that 1), the Obama administration “may have” been surveilling Trump and his campaign operatives as early as June of 2016, and 2), since the “love affair” with Putin disappeared, (along with Syrian planes), when 59 Tomahawks, (a racist name for a bomb), reined down on the region?

Have you noticed how the liberal media’s reporting of Trump’s low approval numbers was minimized when their own polling ALSO showed 1) that 96% of Trump voters would vote for him again, and 2), that if the election was held today, Trump would win both the electoral and popular vote---destroying the liberal’s narrative that Hillary belongs in the White House?

Have you noticed how the liberal media reacts to any and all things conservative as either racist, sexist, or hateful as if the words could never be applied to their audience or the alt-left protesters, or that this was the exclusive, (and failed), campaign message for Hillary and the Democrats throughout the 2016 campaign season?

Finally, (for now), have you noticed how the liberal media is fervently going after/demonizing General Flynn for accepting money, ($35,000), from foreign governments, (or their subsidiaries), while NEVER/RARELY reporting---or completely ignoring---the millions “collected” from these entities by the Clinton Foundation, (Hillary & Bill Clinton, esquires), or, how the Russians gained ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium reserves while Bill Clinton received, (from the Russians) a $500,000 payment for a 30-minute speech while another 2.5 million was funneled into the Foundation?

Now, substitute the “liberal media” with Democrats, since there’s clearly no difference between the two.

Note: commenting system provided by Disqus---please feel free to use it.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

The State of the Democrats & Their Complicit Media, Firmly United in All Things Anti-Trump, Anti-Republican: (Part One)

(Editors note: This post will be a series of explanations and observations to the state of the Democratic Party, their fully backed and complicit Media, and the many factions of the liberal left, working  in concert, (both out front and in the shadows), to facilitate in the total obstruction of the party currently in control of our government.  Part One basically explains/frames who the immediate Opposition is, Democrats, and their unique relationship with an obsessed media resolved to resist and reject all things presented by this new government.  Parts 2 & 3 will delve further into the parties’ involvement, part and partial of the left’s movement, who are working in the clandescent shadows to thwart the direction in which the country is moving, including the Establishment D.C. “government”---both Democrats and Republicans---who prefer to maintain the status quo in Washington.  With advent of the new media, the battle of the minds and ideologies has never been so exposed to the pundits and political junkies of the Democratic Left, who enjoyed a majority of the Media’s output for decades---virtually unopposed.  Those days are over.)  

Have you noticed, (not unexpectedly), that since Hillary Clinton lost the election, the Democrats, and her fawning liberal media has an instant negative retort or derogatory statement “pre-prepared” for any and all propositions put forth by our Republican-run government?

Why doesn’t CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the anti-Trump Liberal Media just come out of the closet and admit they’re just another wing of the liberal-left resistance party?  

Politically, the Democrats are boxed into their own demagoguery.  For eight years, all you heard from Democrats, (and by extension, their mouthpiece media), was how Republicans refused work with President Obama, or his policies, as he attempted to swing the nation further to the left.  Fast forward to today, and it’s a complete reversal.  The voting base of the Democratic Party are insisting, no demanding, that every Democrat MUST RESIST with every bone in their frail bodies.  Any form, or appearance of compromise, (by any Democrat), is met with the threat of immediate expulsion from the party.

The mantra of the Democratic Left is, “we must resist---at all cost”.

This, [attitude], leaves the Democratic leadership, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, in the position of an opposition party resolved to reject any and all legislation presented to the body.  The consideration that a new law might benefit a majority of Americans does not matter with the left---it must be rejected outright because, well, we’re Democrats---end of story?

Well, not quite.  The complicit, (and hypocritical), Liberal Media stands firmly behind the Democrats’ every move.  Gleefully and with sheer delight of their liberal-left readership/viewers, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, the Alphabet Networks, (and the list goes on and on), joins in the cascade of opposition to all things Trump and the Republican Party.  The Liberal Media sees no irony in their own 8-year argument that a party opposed to a liberal socialist ideology might have a credible voice, instead of becoming vilified in every publication as the enemy of the state, bordering on sedition, and deserving of their, [the Media’s], ire and admonition---toleration, civil debates and discussion be damned.  Today, the Liberal Media almost condones the actions of the far left’s “right” to violently protest, destroy public property, and most importantly, put an end to the First Amendment when it does not agree with the left’s ideology.

And make no mistake, just like the Democrats, this medium is still clearly in a state of shock that Hillary Clinton is not in the White House.  Three-plus months after Trump’s inauguration, this entire body are still in the denial and anger stage---with the acceptance of reality basically unattainable in the foreseeable future.  To expect the Democrats or their Liberal Media to act in a rational, analytical, intelligent, (forget logical or objective), way to advance societies’ needs, ambitions, and dreams of prosperity and independence, is a delusional aberration of their intentions, and secondary to their mission, which is to control all lives under the direction of a central and socialist-minded government. 

Democrats, and the established Liberal Media see themselves as the guardians of this perverted and twisted ideology---soundly rejected by the people of this nation since the advent of ObamaCare, the federally mandated instruction that the people must buy a product or face exhaustible and debilitating financial retribution.

Since the day ObamaCare was shoved down the throats of the American public, both the Democrats, and their complicit media have failed miserably to understand the veracity of an angered electorate, who have refused to comply with this sick ideology that only a central federal government knows what’s best for its people.  Given the results of a series of elections, 2010, 2014, and 2016, one would think they would “get the message”.  Clearly, they do not.