Friday, December 8, 2017


Hint: There are Russians and Democrats INVOLVED.

As I had explained in my post last Sunday, (Dec. 3rd), House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes had run out of patience with Robert Mueller's stall-tactics about "demoted" FBI hot shot Peter Strzok.  Nunes had formally requested information on August 24th with a subpoena, and Mueller's team has yet to respond. 

But, let’s digress for just a moment, (actually, one minute-fifty-four seconds), and recall how a Democratic Presidential Candidate---not placed under oath---managed to have thousands of emails destroyed “without her knowledge” and is subsequently absolved of any "intentional" wrong-doing.

In this extremely short video clip, while questioning former FBI Director James Comey, Congressional Representative Jim Jordan, (yes, he’s a Republican), points out---in context---to Mr. Comey exactly what Hillary Clinton did as a result of destroying her emails while obstructing an ongoing investigation.  Keep in mind, according to Comey's boss, Loretta Lynch, this whole investigation is only "a matter". July 7th, 2016. (link to this video):

As you can see from this video, (above), and the following two, Jim Jordan seems to ask questions these people either don't have the answers to, or refuse to answer because some one else has that authority---not Comey, not Sessions, and now, not Wray.  This tactic of passing the buck has got to stop.

Then, in this video testimony, published November 14th, 2017, Jim Jordan questions Attorney General Jeff Sessions about the events that took place in the summer of the 2016 Presidential race, specifically, about Fusion GPS, Uranium One, now fired FBI Director Comey's leaking of information to the New York Times, (via a professor friend), which triggers the appointment of a Special Counsel. (link to this video):

At first, Jeff Sessions tells Jim Jordan he can't divulge certain facts and conversations stating, "I'm not able to answer that".  Then, when Jordan asked Sessions for information on if and who is investigating leaks to CNN, again, Sessions says he's not able to divulge these answers because it's now into the investigative powers of the Special Council.  Later in this conversation, Sessions actually gets quite indignant with Jordan explaining how FACTS are necessary to the consideration of a second special council.

Needless to say, if you watch this video a second time, you can't help but get more pissed at Sessions' continued stone-walling while pretending to be totally ignorant of the facts. 

Fast forward to yesterday, (December 7th), and in Jim Jordan's questioning of now FBI Director Christopher Wray, one thing seems to be crystal clear---Jim Jordan is almost the only person to know the facts, present them to the people, and expects both answers and actions. (link to this video):

Once again, the focus in this conversation brings us back to that pesky dossier.  Jordan is asking for two specific answers---who prepared and submitted the application to the FISA courts, and was the dossier "document" part of that application?

Christopher Wray's response could have been read right out of a "How to be an FBI Director's" manual, literally filled with the same damned answers both Comey and Sessions gave---WE DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ANSWER THAT.

Bottom Line: Did Peter Strzok, while representing the FBI, present this dossier---as a credible document---to the FISA courts to obtain a search warrant allowing the FBI, (and other intelligence agencies), to surveil, wire-tap, and unmask American Citizens?

Further, (and this could be a far more egregious and illegal undertaking), was the FBI colluding with the DNC in obtaining this warrant---for the purpose of using this material against a Presidential Candidate?

Current FBI Director Christopher Wray, (and by extension, Attorney General Jeff Sessions) had better think long and hard about their reason to not divulge this information to the House Intelligence Committee, and more importantly, to the Citizens of the United States of America.

The Public has every right to know if departments within the Federal Government are committing collusion and corruption by purposely refusing to reveal these facts from their electors.

Monday, December 4, 2017

Renowned Liberal Lawyer Defends Trump’s Constitutional Rights and Authorities---Blowing Feinstein’s and the Media’s False Narratives out of the water.

Editor's note: This conversation took place this morning, (12/04/17), on Fox & Friends between Brian Kilmeade and Liberal Professor Alan Dershowitz.  When the video becomes available, I will post it in this thread.

Dershowitz’s response to Feinstein’s comments about President Trump on Meet the Press, saying “I think the investigative committees are putting a case together for obstruction of justice.”

Alan Dershowitz:  Senator Feinstein simply doesn’t know what she’s talking about---there is no obstruction of justice when a President fires his FBI director, (Comey), or any one else, or to instruct his justice department to investigate anyone---it’s within his constitutional authority to do so, and I hope Mueller doesn’t make this mistake, or he will be causing a constitutional crisis.

Dershowitz goes on to cite precedence, ie, other Presidents who have done the same thing and were NEVER questioned about their constitutional authority.

Dershowitz also says the fact that Trump has not exercised his authority to pardon Flynn suggest there’s no obstruction of justice going on.  He also said Trump had every right to instruct Flynn, (while in the transition team), to delay the sanctions Obama had imposed against Russia---it’s his right to do so, and it is not obstruction.

(Note: all of Dershowitz’s statements were paraphrased, but almost word for word)

Update---Video Added

Sunday, December 3, 2017


"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!" (Sir Walter Scott, 1808)

And, according to the Washington Examiner's Byron Scott, there's a whole bunch of deception going on.  And Devin Nunes has had enough of it:

Byron York: Nunes blows up, threatens contempt after FBI stonewalls House on Russia investigator demoted for anti-Trump bias
by Byron York | Dec 2, 2017, 6:38 PM  

"House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has issued an angry demand to the FBI and Department of Justice to explain why they kept the committee in the dark over the reason Special Counsel Robert Mueller kicked a key supervising FBI agent off the Trump-Russia investigation.

Stories in both the Washington Post and New York Times on Saturday reported that Peter Strzok, who played a key role in the original FBI investigation into the Trump-Russia matter, and then a key role in Mueller's investigation, and who earlier had played an equally critical role in the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation, was reassigned out of the Mueller office because of anti-Trump texts he exchanged with a top FBI lawyer, Lisa Page, with whom Strzok was having an extramarital affair. Strzok was transferred to the FBI's human resources office — an obvious demotion -- in July.

The Post reported that Strzok and Page exchanged text messages that "expressed anti-Trump sentiments and other comments that appeared to favor Clinton."

York goes on to explain how Nunes was unaware of this little "text affair", and had been asking the Mueller team for information since August 24th with a subpoena.  The subpoena also directly asked for information on the Trump Dossier---all unanswered by the FBI and the DOJ.  York lays out a timeline of where Nune's committee continues to ask for information on Strzok, and how each time receives no response.

What Nunes did get came from, (or was leaked to), the New York Times and the Washington Post, who both wrote that this demotion of Strzok might hurt Mueller's credibility while helping President Trump:

"Among federal law enforcement officials, there is great concern that exposure of the texts they exchanged may be used by the president and his defenders to attack the credibility of the Mueller probe and the FBI more broadly," the Post reported. The Times reported that "the existence of the text messages is likely to fuel claims by Mr. Trump that he is the target of a witch hunt."

What it did fuel was a stern response from Nunes:

"By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress' constitutional oversight responsibility," Nunes said in a statement Saturday afternoon. "This is part of a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this committee's oversight work, particularly oversight of their use of the Steele dossier. At this point, these agencies should be investigating themselves."

(Read the full Byron York story here to see the whole reason Nunes is deservedly pissed off)

Who would have thunk that a little old affair, a few texts, and an acknowledged Trump-Hater would get in the way of a Special Prosecutor's best laid plans?

Right at the moment, (sincere or not), Mueller's credibility rates about a 2 on the scale of 1-10.  Throw in the "fact" that now it turns out Flynn was under the orders of Obama's administration to "freely converse" with any foreign government entity---including Russian officials---Mueller's, and the Liberal Media's supposed fall guy, (that was supposed to implicate Trump surrogates and possibly even the President)---the general may be getting walking papers or a mild sentence, rather than becoming the "Trump Card". 

I'd also note that from reading this story, I get the impression Nunes and his team are pushing their powers to the edge, forcing Mueller to either announce prematurely he's got nothing on Trump and/or the investigation's going to wrap up soon.  Either way, if one more of Mueller's "team of Trump-hating Democrats" he hired to do his "dirty work" gets publicly outed as biased against the President, Mueller might as well resign.

One thing is certain.............Putin must be laughing his ass off.

Trump's got to be chuckling a bit too.  

Oh My!  Collusion!!!

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Susan Collins Has All the Cards----For Now

Corker, Collins, and Flake.  Remember those names.  It takes three Republican Senators to hold up one of the most important pieces of legislation in the Republican Party’s history, and these three know it.

Two, (Corker and Flake), are retiring and have nothing to lose in screwing up the bill.  Susan Collins (R-Maine), who caters to liberal thinking more often than not, also knows that as long as the three of them remain “no’s” together, they’ve got the entire Republican Senate by the balls----and, she’s squeezing them tighter than than a bull's asshole in fly season.

All Collins wants? Two years of ObamaCare subsidies and “a host of other issues”:

“Collins has been pushing for lawmakers to pass Alexander-Murray, which provides two years of ObamaCare cost-sharing reduction payments, as well as her legislation with Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) that would provide funding for "reinsurance" programs aimed at bringing down premiums.

Passing both bills, Collins argues, is necessary after a repeal of ObamaCare's individual insurance mandate was included in the tax bill. She noted that the Collins-Nelson measure is also part of the deal.

"I still would prefer that the individual mandate [repeal] were not in the bill. ... It complicates this whole issue and when you pull one piece of the Affordable Care Act out it has an impact on premiums and that's why Alexander-Murray and Collins-Nelson are so important," she said.”  (LINK)

As you can see, Mz. Collins is still hanging onto the dream of saving ObamaCare, even though the program is on its last legs.  She wants it all…………or nothing, or, it's a big fat no.

Then again, if either Flake or Corker decide to “play their hands” ahead of her, McConnell can tell Collins to go pound sand.

All the Republicans need is just ONE VOTE from one of them to hit the 50, and VP Pence gets all the glory, errr breaks the tie, sending this bill to conference.

McConnell should at least check with both Corker and Flake to see if their cost/price might be a little cheaper than Collins’ demands.  Again, it only takes one to break Collins’ stranglehold on the rest of the Republican Senate.

It’s “Let’s Make a Deal” Time.

(cross-posted at The Sparta Report)

Tuesday, November 28, 2017


President Trump held a meeting today to start  negotiations for the Dec. 8 government funding deadline.  Only one problem; Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi decided to not show up for the meeting.

"They have been all talk and no action," Trump said. "Now it's even worse. It's not even talk."

The reason Chuck and Nancy gave for not showing up?  They were offended by Trump's tweet earlier in the day:

"Meeting with 'Chuck and Nancy' today about keeping government open and working. Problem is they want illegal immigrants flooding into our Country unchecked, are weak on Crime and want to substantially RAISE Taxes. I don't see a deal!"

Trump also said at the meeting he wasn't surprised by their no-show, since "we're lowering taxes and all the Democrats want to do is raise taxes and flood the country with illegal immigrants".

The next thing these cowardly Democrats will try to do, is shut down the government and point their fingers at Trump.  Not going to work this time kids.

Monday, November 27, 2017

Wednesday, November 22, 2017


David Gergen: “Trump shouldn’t get into the gutter with this ungrateful father, it’s beneath the respect of the office.” (paraphrased)

Also Gergen: Despite CNN putting up the Trump quote that “This is a special time for women“, (meaning women CAN COME FORWARD now with far less fear of retribution), Gergen regurgitates: “Trump’s now on the side of the men and not on the side of the women”---The Classic Liberal Progressive tactic Hillary Clinton and the Democrats employed in the 2016 Election in playing the Gender Card.  The Nation rejected it---in massive waves---as it played a part in Clinton’s loss.

Gergen has found his “little niche” with CNN, and, even though he served in the Nixon, Ford, and Reagan administrations, the old codger doesn’t make any bones about being an Establishment Trump-Hating crony in the vain of the Bushes, McConnells, McCains, and the long list “our friend” BizChuck prefers to pretend is non-existent.

As for Roy Moore, I’m still with “the jury’s out” portion of the party that believes due process is deserved before the man is put on a cross.  

“The allegations are extremely damming” doesn’t cut it in my book.

And neither does “credibly accused”.  What the hell does this mean anyway?

There was far too much of a movement/campaign that was mounted against the man over a short time period , (including the $30 million the Senate Majority Leader threw at him, and now this very similar tactic that the Hillary Democrats employed in the final weeks of the Presidential election---women suddenly having extremely thin 40-year old recollections.)

(And, it should be noted that in those final weeks of the 2016 election the Mainstream Media paraded out these 8-10 women and wrote about their “supposed” accusations and flimsy allegations in every newspaper and online site---ON THE FRONT PAGES---24/7.  One simple question must be asked: Where are they now?)

Guy Benson said on Fox News this morning that “if Trump goes down there and campaigns for Moore, the Democrats will say “here’s the leader of the Republican party campaigning for some one who’s been “credibly accused” (by nine women now) of sexual misconduct.”  There's that pathetic meme again---credibly accused.  By who?

When the original story first broke out against Moore, Republicans, Democrats, and even most of the Media said: “We must look at the facts first before passing judgment and condemning the man”.

That sensible---and CREDIBLE---statement didn’t last 24 hours.

Tuesday, November 21, 2017


Filed under “Who’s the Turkey”: In the spirit of the Holiday Season, the left-stream Media still can’t help themselves with their prejudiced condemnation of our President, while protecting their liberal perverts, in and out of their industry:
Christine Romans at CNN did a thirty-second run-through spot on the White House’s annual “Pardoning of the Turkeys” in the most speedy and sarcastic way she could. Racing through the script, as if she needed a potty break…….:
“President Trump set to wield his pardoning powers without controversy today at a Rose Garden ceremony. The President will grant clemency to two hand-picked Turkeys named Drumstick and Wishbone. The point of all of this---I wonder what’s the point of all of this, but they do it anyway, [as her co-host laughs in the background]---it’s a tradition.” ~ END.
She wasn’t up against a “hard-break” as the CNN diva sprinted through the announcement as if there was something in her mouth she needed to “spit out” as quickly as possible.
Last year, November 23rd, 2016 CNN introduced the Turkey Pardoning with a 2:31 video as Barry granted clemency to “taters & tots”. Obama spent most of his monologue making metaphoric Turkey jokes, (and can’t stop laughing at his own jokes as if the script said “laugh now moron” throughout).
Needless to say, the lengthy fanfare was to be celebrated---”without controversy”.
Meanwhile, over on MSNBC, (with a ticker-caption “SO WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO AL FRANKEN” BY RUTH MARCUS) the Morning Joe bimbo-ette tries to point out that “Franken did, allegedly, (while Mika repeats the word allegedly in the background), and forcibly shove his tongue into her mouth---if that is proven to be the case, (Joe, interrupting: “how does she prove that?”), and then, Mika interjects: “We’re the judge, the jury, and the cops”. Marcus never did get her point out---Joe and Mika made sure of that, providing a solid defense for Franken.
With “the table set”---that Franken “might not be all that bad”---Willie Geist steps in to ask the question: “I’ve had conversations with women over the last week and asked them, “should Al Franken be painted in the same boat, or in the same TV graphic with Harvey Weinstein, should they both be run out of public life? And, the answer I got was NO.
Mika then goes after Charlie Rose: “I want to know where all these people are in the CBS and PBS community”. “I want to know where the Evette Vegas’s at ABC are.” “At least Evette, (sp), Vegas---a woman---admits she messed up”, by hiding these perverts.
Then came this shocking revelation from Psycho Joe: “What happened 20-30 years ago does not happen today” (really Joe?)
Back at CNN, Rep Debbie Dingle is sharing her #metoo moment with Camerota, and they show a clip of Gale King over at CBS, (over the Charlie Rose perversion), both saying this “troubling news” is making it hard for them “to wrap their heads around”---perhaps a poor choice of words. Dingle says, “how do we send a message to these men that YOU CAN’T DO THIS ANYMORE?” Sure sounds like a present-tense statement to me? What do you think Joe?
The reeking hypocrisy and the stench of these liberals defending their own perverts, was enough to chase the aroma of a Turkey basting in the oven out into the backyard---with the dogs. 

Pass the Chivas Regal, and spare the ice.

(cross-posted at the Sparta Report)

Sunday, November 5, 2017


Photo Credit: History Lovers Club@historylvrsclub
The Federal Income tax was created with the 16th Amendment in 1913.  This single act became the "cancer" of ceding power to a Federal Government, and a leverage against its people---through taxation---that is debated to this day.

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

To be accurate, the United States Congress did enact a federal income tax in 1861 to fund the Civil War, (a flat tax of 3% for incomes above $800), and revised it in 1862, (with a graduated tax of 3%-5% on incomes over $600). The act did have a specified termination date, 1866, but the Politicians had gotten a taste of the poisonous taxation tree---controllable cash in the Federal coffers. When a "similar" entity, The British Government, began taxing the Colonials to defray the cost of maintaining the military presence protecting the colonies, the people rebelled and a Revolution ensued.  The outcome was the creation of an independent Nation---A United States of America.  

(It should be noted that soon after the rebellion against British taxes, the next step by the Brits was to begin confiscating ALL WEAPONS, starting with the Massachusetts Militia.  The Brits were met with a determined corp of "soon to be Americans", and driven out of Boston.  Not long after, a Patriotic American sympathizer by the name of George Washington was appointed by Congress to command the Continental Army, and the rest is history.)

I guess the point here is that when any government authority decides to remove two items sacredly precious to its people---their money and their arms---that government should and must consider the ramifications or their actions.

Taxation, and tax reforms have taken place by our Federal Government over our history where funds were rarely ever returned to the people.  Not long after the glut of Federal taxation, additional local and state taxation added to this cancer---all in the name of "the public good".  In fact, there was a period where the local and state governments taxed its people at an alarming and undisciplined rate according to The Tax Foundation:

 “Until 1940, state and local government were responsible for most government spending and collected most government revenues, except during major wars.

The early years of the series hold a surprise, at least from the perspective of 2014. State and local government revenues and outlays were once significantly greater than those of the federal government. In 1930, state and local government receipts were 8.0 percent of GDP to compared 3.3 percent at the federal level, and state and local government outlays were 9.1 of GDP compared to 3.5 percent for the federal government.”

While much higher than before, federal government receipts and expenditures stayed within relatively narrow bands from the midpoint of the 20th century until just before the Great Recession. During the period 1950-2006, federal receipts averaged 17.9 percent of GDP, and federal expenditures averaged 20.9 percent of GDP.[13]"  (charts and footnotes can be found from this info above at this link)

Following an FY 2018 Budget Resolution, on Thursday, November 2, 2017, the United States House of Representatives, (thru the Ways and Means Committee), Chairman Kevin Brady introduced the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, one of the most serious tax cut and reform "legislative blueprint" submitted since the Reagan era.  I call it a blueprint for the obvious reasons, as, under regular order of the House, the bill is in its infant stage.  Changes can and will be made as it moves through the House Chamber, on to the Senate, back to the joint Committee, majority approval by both Chambers, and then on to the President's desk.

As for the Politicians and Policy-makers, (along with their lobbyist "friends" & special interest "investors"), the bill is being met with a wide range of opinions, from guarded optimism from Republicans, to the expected outright disdain from the "we always embrace tax increases" Democrats.

For what it's worth, the Business Insider lays out a fairly good summation of the blueprint with the expenditures and revisions.  (For the record this author does not confirm or deny that the information supplied by the BI is completely factual, only that it is basically informative).

Like almost all legislation, there are winners and losers, and no bill is ever considered without controversy, opinions, and, in the case of the Democrats, outright indignant repulsion---surprise, surprise.

As this author has stated above, we've come a long way from when our Government began to tax its people as it, [the Governments, local, states, and Federals], metastasized and legitimized itself in the redistribution of the People's money through taxation.  Reforms and/or reductions have rarely materialized since the 16th Amendment.

What may come out of this current legislation is anyone's guess.  Under the "proper principle" that what our government takes in---from its people---should be the limit of what it spends, (ok, laugh it up), any form of reduction, (less money taken in and more given back to the people), would be a welcomed outcome, especially when representative taxation has become a joke.

The stakes are high.  The power of the government to tax its citizens should be limited and restricted within the boundaries of the will of the People.  

Speak up and out, or you will leave most of these decisions into the hands of the Politicians and the Policy-makers in Washington who appear to feel little fear or reservation from their constituents.

Personally, I'd prefer this nation returned to a time when the Federal Government possessed far less of the people's money to run their bureaucratic  juggernaut.  Our Businessman-turned-President seems to grasp this concept, (or we hope so), as this bill moves forward.  What finally reaches his desk remains to be seen.  

Thursday, November 2, 2017


Donna Brazile Throws Wasserman-Schultz, Obama, Hillary Clinton, Robby Mook, and Bernie Sanders Under the Bus---Fails to Mention ONE WORD About Giving Hillary Questions Before Debate:

Politico: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC  "When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign."  By DONNA BRAZILE November 02, 2017

Rov: I had to get to the bottom of this Politico story to discover Brazile has a book coming out on November 7th---“Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House”

This Politico Story is a prelude with excerpts from Brazile’s book.

(Note: I’m not intending to promote Brazile’s book, I’m only pointing out the facts that, [according to Brazile’s accounts], she claims she inherited “a mess” when taking over the DNC, and then proceeds to throw the entire party under the bus.  Read the article if you care to, or not. )

The entire Politico story appears to be a conglomeration of a feeble and disingenuous attempt to “apologize to Bernie”, (since she did stab the man in the back in a debate), and then---in the typical fashion of Liberal Democrats---blames EVERYONE she came in contact with when the DNC handed her a party in complete shambles.

"Before I called Bernie Sanders, I lit a candle in my living room and put on some gospel music. I wanted to center myself for what I knew would be an emotional phone call.

I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested. I’d had my suspicions from the moment I walked in the door of the DNC a month or so earlier, based on the leaked emails. But who knew if some of them might have been forged? I needed to have solid proof, and so did Bernie."

The rest of this extensive article reads like a "who dunnit", where terms like "money laundering", an "insider agreement" where Hillary's Campaign literally takes over the finances and control of the DNC, as Brazile searched for "evidence of internal corruption".

Then, she made that call to Bernie to inform him she had found CANCER:

“Hello, senator. I’ve completed my review of the DNC and I did find the cancer,” I said. “But I will not kill the patient.”

I discussed the fundraising agreement that each of the candidates had signed. Bernie was familiar with it, but he and his staff ignored it. They had their own way of raising money through small donations. I described how Hillary’s campaign had taken it another step.

I told Bernie I had found Hillary’s Joint Fundraising Agreement. I explained that the cancer was that she had exerted this control of the party long before she became its nominee. Had I known this, I never would have accepted the interim chair position, but here we were with only weeks before the election."

As I had mentioned above, nowhere in this Political story is one word about her admitting to supplying Hillary with debate questions.  After months of denying the betrayal and transgressions against her own Party, Brazile did indeed admit it, somewhere around the middle of March, 2017, that she was complicit in contributing to the CANCER:

"Former interim Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile admitted Friday that she forwarded Democratic primary town hall questions to members of Hillary Clinton's campaign – something she had previously denied."  (LINK)

One can only wonder, (since this writer won't be reading her book), if Brazile throws a small paragraph in her book about how she participated in the rigging of an American Election, while throwing the rest of her party under a HUGE bus.  Hey, it's all about the money, right Donna?

Thursday, October 26, 2017


In a shocking turn of events, the Trump/Russian Collusion investigations, (accusations that the Trump Campaign colluded with Russian Government operatives to effect the outcome of a U.S. election), which have been running for over a year, has come full circle, right back to the door-steps of the Clinton Campaign, the DNC, and other characters to be named---and possibly looking at criminal charges.

Ironically, this story broke in the Washington Post, a news medium that has railed against Mr. Trump since the day Hillary Clinton was defeated in the 2016 Presidential Election.
Needless to say, the Liberal Mainstream Anti-Trump Media, (who have been obsessed with this Trump Collusion story since Trump's inauguration), are devastated at revelation that "their candidate", Hillary Clinton, was behind, no, at the forefront of colluding with the Russian Government in attempting to effect the outcome of an American Election.

Verified Clarification:  This Trump---now Clinton Dossier---was a totally fabricated document, generated by Russian operatives, and delivered to a retired British intelligence officer, who was employed by Fusion GPS, who's services were retained, (and paid for), by the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.

Nick-named "The Pee Tape" and "The Golden Shower", in progress............ 

Monday, October 16, 2017

October 16th 2017---The Day Lindsay Graham Defeated Himself, and His Party

The Democrat’s campaign coffers are as empty as their morally bankrupt Hollywood promoters---few are contributing, more are hiding under their rocks in total shame.  But, let me get back to this in a moment.

Has anyone noticed that many of Trump’s executive orders are specifically designed to put the onus/responsibility to take action on his feckless Congress?  Think about it, when Donald Trump began to see “the writing on the wall” [that his own legislative party would not join together in total unity to pass his agenda], the businessman-turned-politician began making the only executive decisions within the scope of his powers, many of which requires the legislative branch to either take action, or take the blame for inaction.

While our friend Bizchuck, (from the Sparta Report) will say: “We need to support these legislators, the Republican Party, and its leadership---or the Demclowns will take our power away”, ---a partially factual statement---I would submit his unfettered devotion, (to the Party over Mr. Trump and the campaign promises that got him elected), may be admirable, but misguided.  If Bizchuck is so fearful that “we” could lose everything---by not supporting the leadership---perhaps he should start by admonishing this Senate “leader”, who‘s basically framed what LOSERS WILL LOOK LIKE, when they do nothing:

Lindsey Graham on "Face the Nation," Oct. 15, 2017

JOHN DICKERSON: The president's put a lot on Congress' plate. There's the question of the dreamers, there's now this health care, there's Iran, you've got to get a budget passed in order to set up tax reform. Are you going to get tax reform done?

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Yeah, if we don't, we're dead. You're going to ask me about Bannon, so I'll just go and ask myself.

JOHN DICKERSON: Steve Bannon, the president's former advisor.

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Yea so what's going on? It's a symptom of a greater problem. If we don't cut taxes and we don't eventually repeal and replace Obamacare, then we're going to lose across the board in the House in 2018. And all of my colleagues running in primaries in 2018 will probably get beat. It will be the end of Mitch McConnell as we know it. So this is a symptom of a greater problem. If we do cut taxes and we do repeal and replace Obamacare, it doesn't matter what Bannon do because we'll win.

JOHN DICKERSON: But Steve Bannon has said that Republicans should go to war against Mitch McConnell. That all y'all should get rid of him and that that should be the Republican rallying cry.

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Mitch McConnell's not our problem. Our problem is that we promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, and we failed. We promised to cut taxes and we have yet to do it. If we're successful, Mitch McConnell's fine. If we're not, we're all in trouble. We lose our majority and I think President Trump will not get reelected.

JOHN DICKERSON: Is Steve Bannon a big problem or a little problem in trying to get anything done? He's saying everything you're doing is going against the cause.

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: He's a symptom of a problem. Bannon can't beat us if we're successful. And if we're not successful, it doesn't matter who tries to beat us, they'll be successful.

(all emphasis/bolds are mine)

By these statements, Lindsey Graham has already framed what a "defeatist" looks like, by not only pointing out his own Party's failures to move Trump's agenda, but, Graham's claim that President Trump will also lose his battle to win a second term---because of the failures of this Congress and its Leadership---is pure unadulterated bullshit!

Graham's "Trump will go down with the ship" attitude slaps every Trump supporter squarely across their face.  Those of us who marched to the polls last November and installed our leader are not even on the same vessel as these feckless and worthless "Republicans" in name only.

When YOUR SHIP sinks, Mr. Graham, you, McConnell, McCain, Flake, and the rest of the slithering snakes in Washington---who have chosen to not support THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE---Donald Trump will not go down with you, and your loser friends.

Graham is right about one thing---their, [his party's], own campaign promises are not coming to fruition by their own hands---and time is running out---which brings me back to the state of the Democrats:

The Democratic Party is in total shambles both morally and financially.  They have no platform, old leadership, and are on the losing side of cultural, economic, and national security debates.  By most polling, Democrats are set up to lose their slim minority in the Senate with Republicans gaining another 6-8 seats.  And, contrary to the Media's---and the pollster's over-weighted rhetoric---Republicans should maintain the House.

Rarely, in the history of the Republican Party, has there been the ability to literally set the Democrats on their heels long enough to move this nation back to the right, where it belongs, and for a good deal of time.

If the status quo Establishment Lindsay Graham's, the McConnell's, and others, aren't around to play a part in this monumental change, so be it.  The Voters are not blind---they clearly see the purposely crafted foot dragging of these old guard parasites, perilously clinging and yearning to return to their days of a structurally deficient hierarchy.  For this reason, they will lose, each of them, individually, and deservedly.

President Trump will wave goodbye, thank them for their service, and move on with the People's Business, the priority these establishment vermin forgot.  We will miss them---like a stale beer, a "what happened" novel, a Hollywood-style lecture on morality, or a Jimmy Kimmel monologue---as they drown in their own defecated epilogues.

Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell and Lindsay Graham will star in the next Hollywood production of "What Happened ll". 

Note: the author reserves the right to insert Paul Ryan's name in this story, and, revise, extend, or edit any portion if necessary for clarification.

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Hitler Learns About Harvey Weinstein

Ok, there's a few spelling errors in this video, but, it's just downright hilarious:


October 12th 2017

Trolled Anti-Trump Media Taking Trump’s Threat of 1st Amendment Seriously

Joey Scrarbutt: He’s undermining a most sacred blah, blah, blah.

Firing Blanks by Quoting 25th Amendment

Democrats & Lamestream Media Totally Ignoring Positive Economic Growth

Biggest Fear: Tax Relief for Middle America and Small Businesses that will create more economic growth.  2nd Biggest Fear: A real corporate tax rate reduction, (Trump wants 20%), that will further fuel production and expansion.

MIA: (or missing in reporting, MIR), ISIS is getting destroyed on all fronts since Trump and His Generals dismantled the ROE’s.

Harvey Weinstein no where to be seen---coverage gone.

Embarrassed Democrat Party, Media, in total breakdown.

Bottom Line:  Despite the Media’s all-out offensive, (90% Negative Press---fake/overweighted polls), against this President, Donald Trump is moving on with his Tax Reform Campaign Promise.  Democrats, their Media, and “some” establishment Republicans are hell bent on insuring he fails on this policy change, and, his most ardent supporters see his political enemies for what they are---the D.C. Establishment, and their final push to destroy any progress.

The DNC coffers are empty.  Thanks to Harvey Weinstein, the Democrat’s “morality high ground” has been destroyed.  Every CARD in their book has been played, and, they have no winning platform that’s resonating with the people.

A Christmas Eve signing of a Tax Reform Bill in the Oval Office would/should suffice in propelling the Populist wing of the Republican Party to state-wide victories, holding the House and increasing the Republican Senate by 5-7 seats.  All of this is possible.  And, the PEOPLE deserve it.

Wednesday, October 11, 2017


"We're Appalled"

Democrats and the Lamestream Media can’t ignore this Harvey Weinstein story.  It goes to the heart of one of their dearest---and now hypocritical---arguments that they are the Party that’s always defended the defenseless.  For more than three decades these politicians knew Harvey was a notorious sexual predator, but, the money and the Hollywood notoriety was far too important, and kept flowing in.  Redefining the word “prostitution” may become necessary.

And, of course, (after five days) Hillary’s “shocked and appalled” at this “discovery”.  More like she’s shocked and appalled the Hollywood Power Structure allowed the Teflon mogul to be outed, when certainly “a cloth” or some “bleach bit” would have erased his history.

Barack and Michelle Obama have yet to release a statement.*

Update: Chris Cuomo: “Did these politicians take the money even though they knew?”   Stelter: “The criminal behavior for decades is the shock”.

Audio: “I swear on my children, go into the bathroom, put this robe on, when you come out, I only want a massage, and it will rocket your career, or, I’ll destroy you”.  (paraphrased, but you get the drift)

*Update-2 The Obamas are also disgusted in this carefully scripted statement:

“Barack Obama, also the beneficiary of a Weinstein fundraiser, spoke out last yesterday. He said in a statement: "Michelle and I have been disgusted by the recent reports about Harvey Weinstein. Any man who demeans and degrades women in such fashion needs to be condemned and held accountable, regardless of wealth or status."

“Any man” Barry?  Does this include any man that allows his own daughter to step into Harvey’s Lair?  Of course, Barry and Mooch had no idea Harvey was a known predator---everyone was clueless!

Harvey Weinstein is the epitome of the Liberal Progressive Hierarchy of the Hollywood Liberals, where the degradation of women is probably rampant.  DEMOCRATS have embraced and relied on this fantasy world for their opinions and their money---for decades.  Mika at Morning Joe calls it “Hollywood’s Worst Kept Secret”.  Here’s the problem Mika---it was NO SECRET.

The Bigger Question?  How many more Hollywood Harveys are out there preying on these weak and defenseless women?  And, how many know who they are?

Tuesday, October 10, 2017


Hurricanes hit Texas, Louisiana, and Florida.  Federal response is overwhelming as the local and state governments are coordinated long before the storms hit the shorelines.  There’s also overwhelming support from THE LOCAL PEOPLE & surrounding communities, helping the stricken get the much needed resources for rescues, post-storm evacuations saving thousands of lives.

Under the Democrats, (Rahm Emanuel), mantra: “You never let a serious crisis go to waste”, the liberal left and their complicit anti-Trump Media threw every storyline in the book to convince the American public that the Trump Administration had failed to provide the life-saving supplies and help to this storm-ravaged region.

Their baseless and almost libelous attempts to defile our President FAILED MISERABLY.  There would be no “Trump’s Katrina”, yet.

Hurricanes Irma and Maria hit the Caribbean islands, (U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico), physically destroying everything in their path, leaving the Democrats and the Media thinking they’ll get a second bite at the “it’s all Trump’s fault” apple.

Barely identifying the demographics and logistics of the region---islands surrounded by water---the Democrats and the Media went back to “work” to provide the false narrative that our Federal Government’s actions, [to supply life-saving assets], were, again, a total failure.  Deploying their top anchors to the region, the media began filming the devastation, and selectively interviewing inhabitants who had yet to receive help from FEMA.  Ignoring the fact that the local governments had virtually zero assets in place, (to clear roads and airports), the liberal media pounced on the opportunity to place all blame on the U.S. Federal Government, ie, Donald J. Trump.

Never mind that FEMA had pre-stationed, (before both storms), assets, supplies, and manpower---inside and outside of the impacted area---that were ready to move into the region as soon as it was safely possible.

As the ports began to pile up with the much needed life-saving supplies, (water, food, and first aid supplies), it was realized, (by most of the general public, here in the U.S., and on the island), that there was a serious short supply of truck-drivers, (less than 20%), to move the goods out of the ports and into the hands of the distribution points.  It was reported that some of those drivers who did show up, had their trucks hijacked in route, further reducing the driver participation.

Mayor of San Juan vs. President Trump

Even as the supplies began to trickle out of the ports, some one reminded the "Democrat" mayor of San Juan that Donald J. Trump has the sole responsibility to restore her island back to prosperity and deserved some much needed scrutiny on his progress.  So, she goes on TV and proclaims “we are going to see is something close to a genocide” if Trump and government agencies didn’t do more to help.  Seizing on the "genocide" quote, Democrats and the Media spread their venomous disdain for this President across the nation and the world---Genocide, Katrina and Trump.

Trump Fights Back and Finds Some Allies

President Trump, (seeing the liberal tactic for what it is), hammers back with a series of tweets, including blaming the mayor of incompetence.  Democrats and the Liberal Media are horrified that a President would challenge their best laid plans to bring him down. How dare a President insult this little lady in need?

Yet, the Governor of Puerto Rico, and another local mayor, Guaynabo’s Angel Perez come to the President's aid, claiming the Mayor of San Juan---and the Media---have it all wrong.  Via, the Daily Caller:

"My experience is different. I have been participating in different meetings at the headquarters of FEMA and our government and the help is coming in and right now my experience is different from hers. I’m receiving help from the government, we are receiving assistance from FEMA, I got people over here helping us with applications for the people that have damage in their houses. And we have here in Guaynabo, we have thousands of people that lost partially or totally their houses.

When asked about Yulín Cruz’s “genocide” comment, Perez took his criticism a step further and revealed that Yulín Cruz has been absent in many meetings with FEMA and other agencies. He said:

“I don’t know why she is saying that. What I can tell you is my experience. She is not participating in any meetings and we had a couple already with the governors and with representation of FEMA and of HUD, of these whole federal agencies that have given us help and she’s not participating in those meetings and some mayors from her political party have been participating, so I don’t know why she is saying that. My experience is very different.”

Perez also said he was looking forward to the President's visit expressing optimism and faith that Trump's presence would be "the best thing to give hope to our people.”

The actions and words of this small town mayor destroyed the Democrats and Media overnight, in their vicious attempt to create a Katrina, blowing their credibility right out of the water, swallowing them up like the Red Sea.

The Fabricated Crisis was thwarted once again by a President who fights back.  And, a mortally wounded Media slithers back under their rock, wondering how this could happen.  

Sadly, they'll be back.

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

House Democrats March to the Capital Steps and ask, no, demand: “When Will it End?”

Republican Congressmen are purposely targeted in a baseball field by a madman who specifically asked which party was on the field.

Twenty-two thousand country western fans are purposely targeted by a madman who “may have” politically selected this group of people because they’re mostly pro-gun and Trump supporters---and Democrats ask when will it end???

I watched this segment yesterday afternoon on Martha MacCallum’s program with fascination as MacCallum interviewed Tony Shaffer.  Yet, I had to find the conversation on the second page of google, (fancy that), where RickWells.US posted this:

“Martha MacCallum reminds us in her introduction of Lt Col Tony Shaffer that he is a CIA-trained intel operative, as he details his perspectives on the Las Vegas terrorist attack.

He says, “I think it’s shaping up to be a very deliberate act of terror, this is beyond dispute. The question becomes motive.” He believes most of the clues for the motive are right in front of us,  noting the parallels with the person who shot Rep Steve Scalise  (R-LA)

Shaffer says the target was “politically selected,” with the perception being that there would be a lot of pro-gun folks there and Trump supporters. He says he believes that Paddock felt it was a legitimate target of political expression.

He says the reason that Hodgkinson and Paddock did what he did was at least partially rooted in the left’s encouragement of the use of violence as an extension and use of political speech. The left has been supporters of Antifa, BAMN and BLM and routinely engaged in violence against Trump supporters during the campaign at the direction of both Obama and Clinton.

He warns against the slippery slope that “violence can become part of someone expressing themselves” and that that is the real danger here. He points out that all of the violence desensitization is on the part of the left, citing Kathy Griffin as an example." (bolds are mine)

(Please go to Rick's site and read this entire story)

Given Shaffer’s analysis, every Republican has the right to ask, no, DEMAND from the Democrats---pointedly---When Will it End?