Have you noticed how the liberal media is cheering that ObamaCare has not (yet) been repealed & replaced because it’s a “loss” for Trump, not because O’Care is in an irreversible death spiral as premiums deductibles continue to skyrocket leaving O’Care unaffordable?
Have you noticed how the liberal media insist Trump’s tax plan must be “revenue neutral”, as if they cared about debts and deficits during Obama’s 8-trillion rein of debt?
Have you noticed how “quickly” the liberal media took the name of Neil Gorsuch out of the news cycle after the newest Supreme Court justice was sworn into office? Or, how much the name of Harry Reid was invoked, (by Republicans), as a reminder that elections do indeed have consequences?
Have you noticed how the liberal media hates the term “Pocahontas”, (falsely claiming it’s racist), while NEVER reporting how the fraud Elizabeth Warren achieved her stature by falsely claiming she was an American Indian?
Have you noticed how the liberal media submits that President Trump has signed little “significant” legislation, (28 bills actually signed), while NEVER reporting that Democrats---in both the House and Senate---have refused to participate in the legislative process, except when they can stall or hold up Trump appointments to his administration?
Have you noticed how the liberal media’s “still unsubstantiated” narrative/accusation [that the Trump Campaign Colluded with the Russian Government to elect our President], has fallen off the front pages since it’s becoming apparent that 1), the Obama administration “may have” been surveilling Trump and his campaign operatives as early as June of 2016, and 2), since the “love affair” with Putin disappeared, (along with Syrian planes), when 59 Tomahawks, (a racist name for a bomb), reined down on the region?
Have you noticed how the liberal media’s reporting of Trump’s low approval numbers was minimized when their own polling ALSO showed 1) that 96% of Trump voters would vote for him again, and 2), that if the election was held today, Trump would win both the electoral and popular vote---destroying the liberal’s narrative that Hillary belongs in the White House?
Have you noticed how the liberal media reacts to any and all things conservative as either racist, sexist, or hateful as if the words could never be applied to their audience or the alt-left protesters, or that this was the exclusive, (and failed), campaign message for Hillary and the Democrats throughout the 2016 campaign season?
Finally, (for now), have you noticed how the liberal media is fervently going after/demonizing General Flynn for accepting money, ($35,000), from foreign governments, (or their subsidiaries), while NEVER/RARELY reporting---or completely ignoring---the millions “collected” from these entities by the Clinton Foundation, (Hillary & Bill Clinton, esquires), or, how the Russians gained ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium reserves while Bill Clinton received, (from the Russians) a $500,000 payment for a 30-minute speech while another 2.5 million was funneled into the Foundation?
Now, substitute the “liberal media” with Democrats, since there’s clearly no difference between the two.
Note: commenting system provided by Disqus---please feel free to use it.
Saturday, April 29, 2017
Thursday, April 27, 2017
The State of the Democrats & Their Complicit Media, Firmly United in All Things Anti-Trump, Anti-Republican: (Part One)
(Editors note: This post will be a series of explanations and observations to the state of the Democratic Party, their fully backed and complicit Media, and the many factions of the liberal left, working in concert, (both out front and in the shadows), to facilitate in the total obstruction of the party currently in control of our government. Part One basically explains/frames who the immediate Opposition is, Democrats, and their unique relationship with an obsessed media resolved to resist and reject all things presented by this new government. Parts 2 & 3 will delve further into the parties’ involvement, part and partial of the left’s movement, who are working in the clandescent shadows to thwart the direction in which the country is moving, including the Establishment D.C. “government”---both Democrats and Republicans---who prefer to maintain the status quo in Washington. With advent of the new media, the battle of the minds and ideologies has never been so exposed to the pundits and political junkies of the Democratic Left, who enjoyed a majority of the Media’s output for decades---virtually unopposed. Those days are over.)
Have you noticed, (not unexpectedly), that since Hillary Clinton lost the election, the Democrats, and her fawning liberal media has an instant negative retort or derogatory statement “pre-prepared” for any and all propositions put forth by our Republican-run government?
Why doesn’t CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the anti-Trump Liberal Media just come out of the closet and admit they’re just another wing of the liberal-left resistance party?
Politically, the Democrats are boxed into their own demagoguery. For eight years, all you heard from Democrats, (and by extension, their mouthpiece media), was how Republicans refused work with President Obama, or his policies, as he attempted to swing the nation further to the left. Fast forward to today, and it’s a complete reversal. The voting base of the Democratic Party are insisting, no demanding, that every Democrat MUST RESIST with every bone in their frail bodies. Any form, or appearance of compromise, (by any Democrat), is met with the threat of immediate expulsion from the party.
The mantra of the Democratic Left is, “we must resist---at all cost”.
This, [attitude], leaves the Democratic leadership, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, in the position of an opposition party resolved to reject any and all legislation presented to the body. The consideration that a new law might benefit a majority of Americans does not matter with the left---it must be rejected outright because, well, we’re Democrats---end of story?
Well, not quite. The complicit, (and hypocritical), Liberal Media stands firmly behind the Democrats’ every move. Gleefully and with sheer delight of their liberal-left readership/viewers, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, the Alphabet Networks, (and the list goes on and on), joins in the cascade of opposition to all things Trump and the Republican Party. The Liberal Media sees no irony in their own 8-year argument that a party opposed to a liberal socialist ideology might have a credible voice, instead of becoming vilified in every publication as the enemy of the state, bordering on sedition, and deserving of their, [the Media’s], ire and admonition---toleration, civil debates and discussion be damned. Today, the Liberal Media almost condones the actions of the far left’s “right” to violently protest, destroy public property, and most importantly, put an end to the First Amendment when it does not agree with the left’s ideology.
And make no mistake, just like the Democrats, this medium is still clearly in a state of shock that Hillary Clinton is not in the White House. Three-plus months after Trump’s inauguration, this entire body are still in the denial and anger stage---with the acceptance of reality basically unattainable in the foreseeable future. To expect the Democrats or their Liberal Media to act in a rational, analytical, intelligent, (forget logical or objective), way to advance societies’ needs, ambitions, and dreams of prosperity and independence, is a delusional aberration of their intentions, and secondary to their mission, which is to control all lives under the direction of a central and socialist-minded government.
Democrats, and the established Liberal Media see themselves as the guardians of this perverted and twisted ideology---soundly rejected by the people of this nation since the advent of ObamaCare, the federally mandated instruction that the people must buy a product or face exhaustible and debilitating financial retribution.
Since the day ObamaCare was shoved down the throats of the American public, both the Democrats, and their complicit media have failed miserably to understand the veracity of an angered electorate, who have refused to comply with this sick ideology that only a central federal government knows what’s best for its people. Given the results of a series of elections, 2010, 2014, and 2016, one would think they would “get the message”. Clearly, they do not.
Have you noticed, (not unexpectedly), that since Hillary Clinton lost the election, the Democrats, and her fawning liberal media has an instant negative retort or derogatory statement “pre-prepared” for any and all propositions put forth by our Republican-run government?
Why doesn’t CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the anti-Trump Liberal Media just come out of the closet and admit they’re just another wing of the liberal-left resistance party?
Politically, the Democrats are boxed into their own demagoguery. For eight years, all you heard from Democrats, (and by extension, their mouthpiece media), was how Republicans refused work with President Obama, or his policies, as he attempted to swing the nation further to the left. Fast forward to today, and it’s a complete reversal. The voting base of the Democratic Party are insisting, no demanding, that every Democrat MUST RESIST with every bone in their frail bodies. Any form, or appearance of compromise, (by any Democrat), is met with the threat of immediate expulsion from the party.
The mantra of the Democratic Left is, “we must resist---at all cost”.
This, [attitude], leaves the Democratic leadership, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, in the position of an opposition party resolved to reject any and all legislation presented to the body. The consideration that a new law might benefit a majority of Americans does not matter with the left---it must be rejected outright because, well, we’re Democrats---end of story?
Well, not quite. The complicit, (and hypocritical), Liberal Media stands firmly behind the Democrats’ every move. Gleefully and with sheer delight of their liberal-left readership/viewers, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Associated Press, the Alphabet Networks, (and the list goes on and on), joins in the cascade of opposition to all things Trump and the Republican Party. The Liberal Media sees no irony in their own 8-year argument that a party opposed to a liberal socialist ideology might have a credible voice, instead of becoming vilified in every publication as the enemy of the state, bordering on sedition, and deserving of their, [the Media’s], ire and admonition---toleration, civil debates and discussion be damned. Today, the Liberal Media almost condones the actions of the far left’s “right” to violently protest, destroy public property, and most importantly, put an end to the First Amendment when it does not agree with the left’s ideology.
And make no mistake, just like the Democrats, this medium is still clearly in a state of shock that Hillary Clinton is not in the White House. Three-plus months after Trump’s inauguration, this entire body are still in the denial and anger stage---with the acceptance of reality basically unattainable in the foreseeable future. To expect the Democrats or their Liberal Media to act in a rational, analytical, intelligent, (forget logical or objective), way to advance societies’ needs, ambitions, and dreams of prosperity and independence, is a delusional aberration of their intentions, and secondary to their mission, which is to control all lives under the direction of a central and socialist-minded government.
Democrats, and the established Liberal Media see themselves as the guardians of this perverted and twisted ideology---soundly rejected by the people of this nation since the advent of ObamaCare, the federally mandated instruction that the people must buy a product or face exhaustible and debilitating financial retribution.
Since the day ObamaCare was shoved down the throats of the American public, both the Democrats, and their complicit media have failed miserably to understand the veracity of an angered electorate, who have refused to comply with this sick ideology that only a central federal government knows what’s best for its people. Given the results of a series of elections, 2010, 2014, and 2016, one would think they would “get the message”. Clearly, they do not.
Saturday, April 22, 2017
Caltrans: 101 will not be re-opened this weekend
LEGGETT, Calif. - Highway 101 will not be reopened this weekend and there are no local detours available, according to Caltrans District 1.
Officials say travel plans should include detouring over onto Interstate 5 via Highway 20, Highway 36, or Highway 299 to loop back towards Highway 101 on the other side of the closure. These detours could take upwards of seven hours.
According to Caltrans District 1, work is progressing at both ends of the slide north of Leggett in Mendocino County this morning.
Caltrans is evaluating whether the north end of the slide is stable enough to begin work safely through the night.
If the slide is stable enough for work at night this would allow Caltrans contractor to work around the clock to get the highway reopened.
Specialized equipment to help in removing debris will be airlifted next week, according to officials.
Caltrans District 1's best estimate in the reopening of Highway 101 to one way traffic control is sometime mid-to-late next week.
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
YES, OBAMA "WIRETAPPED" TRUMP---WITH A WHOLE LOT A HELP FROM HIS "FRIENDS"
As the Liberal-"we hate Trump"-mainstream media mysteriously became silent after months of "Trump's Team Colluded With the Russians", (an accusation the U.S. Senate, the House, and the Media's top investigators can't find a single hint of), political pundits wondered, why the sudden silence?
For a two solid weeks after Trump's infamous Saturday morning tweet stating "Obama "wiretapped" Trump Tower", the media went wall to wall with headlines that the newly elected President had absolutely no proof or evidence of such an outrageous statement. And, they, [the anti-Trump Media], demanded evidence.
Yet, when House intelligence chairman Devin Nunes actually found credible evidence, released it to the press, and then passed it on to Trump administrators, the media immediately attacked Nunes for compromising the House investigation, and demanded he recuse himself from his job. How could Nunes possibly do his job, objectively, if he shared facts with our President? Never mind that his counter-part, Adam Schiff was conducting his own partisan witch-hunt, supplying and releasing unsubstantiated media provided garbage to the public. Not long after, Schiff, the Democrats, and most importantly, the mainstream media fell silent.
Enough with the Suspense!
Fast forward to yesterday, March 17th, and John Nolte at the Daily Wire exposes the whole truth about who was "wiretapping" Donald Trump, and for how long:
BOMBSHELL Report: Entire Western World Helped Obama WIRETAP Trump
"If you are wondering why our national media has pretty much dropped the whole Trump-Is-A-Russian-Manchurian-Candidate thing, it is because the naked truth about the Obama administration's chilling spying -- something the media has covered up for months -- is finally coming to light. Last week, both The Washington Post and The New York Times quietly reported that the Obama administration had "wiretapped" (their word, not mine) a Trump staffer.
The Trump-hating Guardian then dropped another bombshell, the news that pretty much every Western intelligence agency in the world was aiding and abetting the Obama administration's unbelievable and unprecedented (Nixon only wanted to do this) abuse of power against a political opponent":
“In other words, the whole world was spying on Trump, not just the Obama administration, and even with all of these resources the Democrats and their media got exactly squat. There is no evidence of any wrongdoing between Team Trump and Russia. There is, however, a growing pile of evidence that Team Barry needs to be investigated by Congress and the Justice Department.”
Read the rest of Nolte's report here, because you won't find it in the mainstream news. They're "quietly" working behind the scenes to find another distracting headline to take the public's minds off the fact that some one, (or many), should be looking for indictments coming in the mail---very soon.
* For more on the Five Eyes, this link provides details on the longstanding alliance, (that may have colluded with Obama and the Democrats to ensure a Trump defeat in the Election and his financial demise).
For a two solid weeks after Trump's infamous Saturday morning tweet stating "Obama "wiretapped" Trump Tower", the media went wall to wall with headlines that the newly elected President had absolutely no proof or evidence of such an outrageous statement. And, they, [the anti-Trump Media], demanded evidence.
Yet, when House intelligence chairman Devin Nunes actually found credible evidence, released it to the press, and then passed it on to Trump administrators, the media immediately attacked Nunes for compromising the House investigation, and demanded he recuse himself from his job. How could Nunes possibly do his job, objectively, if he shared facts with our President? Never mind that his counter-part, Adam Schiff was conducting his own partisan witch-hunt, supplying and releasing unsubstantiated media provided garbage to the public. Not long after, Schiff, the Democrats, and most importantly, the mainstream media fell silent.
Enough with the Suspense!
Fast forward to yesterday, March 17th, and John Nolte at the Daily Wire exposes the whole truth about who was "wiretapping" Donald Trump, and for how long:
BOMBSHELL Report: Entire Western World Helped Obama WIRETAP Trump
The Trump-hating Guardian then dropped another bombshell, the news that pretty much every Western intelligence agency in the world was aiding and abetting the Obama administration's unbelievable and unprecedented (Nixon only wanted to do this) abuse of power against a political opponent":
Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.
The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland.
Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes*” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.
Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.Nolte goes on to explain in detail how these alliances worked together, why Judge Napolitano was suspended, then quickly back on the network, and how the news media, (the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the U.K. Guardian), supplied/revealed how and why, (with all this worldly intelligence searching for collusion), never found one scintilla of evidence of collusion, but did reveal who was spying on Trump:
“In other words, the whole world was spying on Trump, not just the Obama administration, and even with all of these resources the Democrats and their media got exactly squat. There is no evidence of any wrongdoing between Team Trump and Russia. There is, however, a growing pile of evidence that Team Barry needs to be investigated by Congress and the Justice Department.”
Read the rest of Nolte's report here, because you won't find it in the mainstream news. They're "quietly" working behind the scenes to find another distracting headline to take the public's minds off the fact that some one, (or many), should be looking for indictments coming in the mail---very soon.
* For more on the Five Eyes, this link provides details on the longstanding alliance, (that may have colluded with Obama and the Democrats to ensure a Trump defeat in the Election and his financial demise).
Monday, April 10, 2017
President Trump's Strike on Syria Met with Consensus Approval---Liberal Media Befuddled
Just days after the Trump administration sends a clear message---to the world---that the use of chemical weapons will not be tolerated, the American Alt-Left Anti-Trump Liberal Media begins their traditional attacks on the President.
Let’s be clear, NOTHING President Trump does--in the eyes of CNN, MSNBC, THE NY SLIMES, THE WASHINGTON COMPOST, and others---can be reported as a positive action, or in the best interest of this nation. NOTHING. As for advising the President on National Security measures, the ALT-LEFT MEDIA will be the first to offer their own authoritative opinions on foreign policies.
CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY REQUIRED?
Politically, this “single action” was met with overwhelming support from Congress, (with the exception of Hillary’s VP, Senator Tim Kaine and Republican Rand Paul), both who questioned the President’s constitutional authority on the military strike.
Further, since politicians follow national polling, (before taking any kind of stand, negative or positive), the 57% approval of Mr. Trump’s strike, muted many of Trump’s political adversaries---for the time being. Add to this approval, the support from U.S. Allies around the world, Democrats and the anti-Trump Media are at an impasse.
The current consensus among many of the politicians is, this strike was o.k., but do it again, and we’ll need to “approve it” first.
RED LINES GAIN POPULARITY…….
“The Sun reported that a joint command centre in Syria said: ‘What America waged in an aggression on Syria is a crossing of red lines. From now on we will respond with force to any aggressor or any breach of red lines from whoever it is and America knows our ability to respond well.’
Got that? From “now on”, we’ll respond to any interference in our private civil war, where we’ve invited Russia and Iran to help decimate our opposition population---by any means necessary.
I would submit that since Putin had a two-hour notice that the Tomahawks were inbound, (and did nothing to stop them), he must have decided Trump's measured response was inevitable, and even perhaps, reasonable, given the entire world had witnessed the gassings, and were demanding a response.
At this point, the alt-left anti-Trump Media will have an extremely hard time keeping their false narrative alive that Putin put Trump in office, ie, "they collectively colluded" to defeat Hillary, when President Trump has thrown a monkey wrench into Putin's, (and the Iranian's), plans to keep Assad in power.
Currently, no one in the Trump Administration has insinuated any form of escalation of U.S. military forces in Syria. Nikki Haley at the U.N. has warned, appropriately, there "could be" more strikes on Assad's government "if" chemical weapons are deployed again.
The Russians, Iranians, Assad's Government, and our own biased Liberal Media will have to deal with Trump's ultimatums. The possibilities are endless on how they will respond, while the entire world is watching to see who blinks first.
Chess anyone?
Let’s be clear, NOTHING President Trump does--in the eyes of CNN, MSNBC, THE NY SLIMES, THE WASHINGTON COMPOST, and others---can be reported as a positive action, or in the best interest of this nation. NOTHING. As for advising the President on National Security measures, the ALT-LEFT MEDIA will be the first to offer their own authoritative opinions on foreign policies.
CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY REQUIRED?
Politically, this “single action” was met with overwhelming support from Congress, (with the exception of Hillary’s VP, Senator Tim Kaine and Republican Rand Paul), both who questioned the President’s constitutional authority on the military strike.
Further, since politicians follow national polling, (before taking any kind of stand, negative or positive), the 57% approval of Mr. Trump’s strike, muted many of Trump’s political adversaries---for the time being. Add to this approval, the support from U.S. Allies around the world, Democrats and the anti-Trump Media are at an impasse.
The current consensus among many of the politicians is, this strike was o.k., but do it again, and we’ll need to “approve it” first.
RED LINES GAIN POPULARITY…….
“The Sun reported that a joint command centre in Syria said: ‘What America waged in an aggression on Syria is a crossing of red lines. From now on we will respond with force to any aggressor or any breach of red lines from whoever it is and America knows our ability to respond well.’
Got that? From “now on”, we’ll respond to any interference in our private civil war, where we’ve invited Russia and Iran to help decimate our opposition population---by any means necessary.
I would submit that since Putin had a two-hour notice that the Tomahawks were inbound, (and did nothing to stop them), he must have decided Trump's measured response was inevitable, and even perhaps, reasonable, given the entire world had witnessed the gassings, and were demanding a response.
At this point, the alt-left anti-Trump Media will have an extremely hard time keeping their false narrative alive that Putin put Trump in office, ie, "they collectively colluded" to defeat Hillary, when President Trump has thrown a monkey wrench into Putin's, (and the Iranian's), plans to keep Assad in power.
Currently, no one in the Trump Administration has insinuated any form of escalation of U.S. military forces in Syria. Nikki Haley at the U.N. has warned, appropriately, there "could be" more strikes on Assad's government "if" chemical weapons are deployed again.
The Russians, Iranians, Assad's Government, and our own biased Liberal Media will have to deal with Trump's ultimatums. The possibilities are endless on how they will respond, while the entire world is watching to see who blinks first.
Chess anyone?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)