Thursday, June 30, 2016
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
WHO'S SUPPORTING RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM?
The liberal mainstream media is attacking Republican Nominee Donald Trump for suspending press credentials to Washington Post reporters. The reason? The Post wrote a nefariously misleading story with a "National Inquirer-approved" headline:
“Donald Trump suggests President Obama was involved with Orlando shooting”
It is obvious, (to most Americans with a conscience), that the Post created this headline with the full intent to suggest Mr. Trump's criticism of Barack Obama's, (and by extension, Hillary Clinton's), policies on protecting this nation from Radical Islamic Terrorism, some how meant Mr. Obama "was involved" in the terrorist attack in Orlando. It, [the headline], was such a "stretch" Trump had justifiably had enough Jeff Bezos and his new play-toy at the Post.
Why a Newspaper of this "caliber" would put this in their headlines? Simple, the liberal rag just got a little more desperate, and Bezos doesn't care if his shoes get dirty.
TWO CAN PLAY THIS "GAME"!
For every anti-Trump Liberal Media screed, I will ask this question:
Is the Washington Post Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
Is the New York Times Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
Is NBC Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
Is CNN Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
See how this works? I'm quite certain this list will grow. When the Liberal Media chooses to attack Donald Trump---for the sole purpose of deflecting from the obvious and immediate threat from RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORISM, I will ask this question.
The argument/debate is clear: Mr. Obama's policies on protecting this nation against a sworn enemy, RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORIST, are not only failing miserably, they are, in part, what has allowed this enemy to brazenly enter our shores and murder innocent American citizens. That the Liberal Media has yet to accept this reality, (and instead chosen to attack a Presidential Nomonee who points out these failures), then, the American Public has every right to ask if the Liberal Media is complicit in defending RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM.
Donald Trump has been explicit and forthright about how his policies would be far different from Mr. Obama's, specifically, a total temporary ban on the importation of Muslims into the United States until a proper vetting process is created and enforced. Further, Mr. Trump has said he will wage a real war on these ISLAMIST TERRORIST, (with all the means and tools necessary to get the job done).
If the Liberal Media is not comfortable with Mr. Trumps views on how to combat RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM, then they have every bit of the 1st Amendment right to say so. BUT! If they chose to lie and deflect from the reality of the fact that this nation has been targeted for extinction by these RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORIST, then I will insist on understanding their motives and ask this simple question:
WHICH SIDE OF THIS WAR ARE YOU ON!??? AMERICA'S OR THE TERRORIST???
(this story was linked and posted at HotGas.net, as well as my twitter account)
“Donald Trump suggests President Obama was involved with Orlando shooting”
It is obvious, (to most Americans with a conscience), that the Post created this headline with the full intent to suggest Mr. Trump's criticism of Barack Obama's, (and by extension, Hillary Clinton's), policies on protecting this nation from Radical Islamic Terrorism, some how meant Mr. Obama "was involved" in the terrorist attack in Orlando. It, [the headline], was such a "stretch" Trump had justifiably had enough Jeff Bezos and his new play-toy at the Post.
Why a Newspaper of this "caliber" would put this in their headlines? Simple, the liberal rag just got a little more desperate, and Bezos doesn't care if his shoes get dirty.
TWO CAN PLAY THIS "GAME"!
For every anti-Trump Liberal Media screed, I will ask this question:
Is the Washington Post Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
Is the New York Times Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
Is NBC Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
Is CNN Supporting Radical Islamic Terrorism?
See how this works? I'm quite certain this list will grow. When the Liberal Media chooses to attack Donald Trump---for the sole purpose of deflecting from the obvious and immediate threat from RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORISM, I will ask this question.
The argument/debate is clear: Mr. Obama's policies on protecting this nation against a sworn enemy, RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORIST, are not only failing miserably, they are, in part, what has allowed this enemy to brazenly enter our shores and murder innocent American citizens. That the Liberal Media has yet to accept this reality, (and instead chosen to attack a Presidential Nomonee who points out these failures), then, the American Public has every right to ask if the Liberal Media is complicit in defending RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM.
Donald Trump has been explicit and forthright about how his policies would be far different from Mr. Obama's, specifically, a total temporary ban on the importation of Muslims into the United States until a proper vetting process is created and enforced. Further, Mr. Trump has said he will wage a real war on these ISLAMIST TERRORIST, (with all the means and tools necessary to get the job done).
If the Liberal Media is not comfortable with Mr. Trumps views on how to combat RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM, then they have every bit of the 1st Amendment right to say so. BUT! If they chose to lie and deflect from the reality of the fact that this nation has been targeted for extinction by these RADICAL ISLAMIST TERRORIST, then I will insist on understanding their motives and ask this simple question:
WHICH SIDE OF THIS WAR ARE YOU ON!??? AMERICA'S OR THE TERRORIST???
(this story was linked and posted at HotGas.net, as well as my twitter account)
Sunday, June 12, 2016
LAMESTREAM MEDIA----"DOMESTIC TERRORISM"---50 DEAD!
In the early morning hours at a popular Gay establishment in Orlando, Florida a "reportedly" lone gunman murdered 20 patrons, while over 40 have been sent to local hospitals.
But, our dear mainstream media was quick to report that this was "an act of domestic terrorism".
The following photos were taken by myself around 4 am pacific time:
Not even in the original press conference did authorities confirm this was a DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK, but the media is already attempting to set the narrative, incorrectly.
Updates to follow...............
Update: The good folks at HotGas.net have a full story up:
BREAKING: Terrorist Attack At Orlando Gay Nightclub, islamic terrorism confirmed, Ramadan Arrives In America, Omar Mateen Named
But, our dear mainstream media was quick to report that this was "an act of domestic terrorism".
The following photos were taken by myself around 4 am pacific time:
Not even in the original press conference did authorities confirm this was a DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACK, but the media is already attempting to set the narrative, incorrectly.
Updates to follow...............
Update: The good folks at HotGas.net have a full story up:
BREAKING: Terrorist Attack At Orlando Gay Nightclub, islamic terrorism confirmed, Ramadan Arrives In America, Omar Mateen Named
Update: Sadly now the casualties have risen to 50 dead. Prayers for the victims and their families.
Update: "Major Muslim Terrorists Makes This Declaration To All Americans: We Are Coming After You, We Will Attack Florida And Slaughter Americans There"
Update: The shooter was Omar Mateen, 29, of Port St. Lucie, Florida. He was a professional security officer and had a license to carry a firearm. The goes the liberal's gun-control narrative---right out the door.
Update: My very good friend Kim Skelton posted on Facebook: “The war on gays and lesbians is being waged by the Democrat party in plain view today.... The mask has come off.”
https://www.facebook.com/kim.skelton.18/posts/1337294712977664
My “humble” response:
What's sadly hypocritical Kim is how the left NEVER said a word about Islamist throwing gays off the tops of buildings, (the silence was embarrassingly deafening by the media), yet when it hits home, the first thing that pops into their "worthless" minds is how did this puke get a gun, and "how can we stop it", ie, more gun-control. The facts are, he was issued a license to carry weapons---legally---and obviously not properly vetted by the FBI, (the same institution that can’t decide whether Hillary exposed our national classified secrets), who had him on the radar THREE TIMES, and some one signed off on his “American allegiance”----most likely under pressure from the Obama-directed “leave my bros alone” policies, that is putting our entire nation in peril. One more very important thing for our dear liberal friends---the frikken GUN DID NOT GO OFF BY ITSELF, IT WAS “CONTROLLED” BY A TERRORIST!!!!!! For those who advocate to disarm our citizens---FORGET IT, IT’S NOT HAPPENING---the ISLAMIC JIHAD is upon us and on our soil, and as our President said today: “This could have happened in ANY COMMUNITY”, so arm yourselves. Don’t let this liberal illiteracy, (of removing your right to own a weapon), put your life and the lives of your families in the hands of the lunatics in government, (or even our brave police forces shackled by political correctness), take whatever means is necessary to protect your loved ones. God WILL protect us………but he NEVER said “let the government take your sword away to fight against evil”.
Extremely pissed off rant over.
Update: "Major Muslim Terrorists Makes This Declaration To All Americans: We Are Coming After You, We Will Attack Florida And Slaughter Americans There"
Update: The shooter was Omar Mateen, 29, of Port St. Lucie, Florida. He was a professional security officer and had a license to carry a firearm. The goes the liberal's gun-control narrative---right out the door.
Update: My very good friend Kim Skelton posted on Facebook: “The war on gays and lesbians is being waged by the Democrat party in plain view today.... The mask has come off.”
https://www.facebook.com/kim.skelton.18/posts/1337294712977664
My “humble” response:
What's sadly hypocritical Kim is how the left NEVER said a word about Islamist throwing gays off the tops of buildings, (the silence was embarrassingly deafening by the media), yet when it hits home, the first thing that pops into their "worthless" minds is how did this puke get a gun, and "how can we stop it", ie, more gun-control. The facts are, he was issued a license to carry weapons---legally---and obviously not properly vetted by the FBI, (the same institution that can’t decide whether Hillary exposed our national classified secrets), who had him on the radar THREE TIMES, and some one signed off on his “American allegiance”----most likely under pressure from the Obama-directed “leave my bros alone” policies, that is putting our entire nation in peril. One more very important thing for our dear liberal friends---the frikken GUN DID NOT GO OFF BY ITSELF, IT WAS “CONTROLLED” BY A TERRORIST!!!!!! For those who advocate to disarm our citizens---FORGET IT, IT’S NOT HAPPENING---the ISLAMIC JIHAD is upon us and on our soil, and as our President said today: “This could have happened in ANY COMMUNITY”, so arm yourselves. Don’t let this liberal illiteracy, (of removing your right to own a weapon), put your life and the lives of your families in the hands of the lunatics in government, (or even our brave police forces shackled by political correctness), take whatever means is necessary to protect your loved ones. God WILL protect us………but he NEVER said “let the government take your sword away to fight against evil”.
Extremely pissed off rant over.
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Obama: "There's no political influence"..........
Obama’s Latest Attempt to Save Clinton From Indictment POTUS delays critical email release to protect Entitled Establishment Darling By Michael Sainato • 06/07/16 12:30pm
“I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI—not just in this case but in any case,” President Obama said in an interview with Fox News this past April. Despite his repeated claims of not influencing the Department of Justice and FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton‘s private email server scandal, Obama has helped shield her throughout the fiasco………
Just as Hillary Clinton has depended on Obama whenever she was cornered in a debate and needed help diverting an issue, she is now depending on him to get through the FBI and Department of Justice investigation long enough to get to become president—at which point there will be no chance of serving the indictment her actions certainly warrant.
“What we already know about her security infractions should disqualify her for any government position that deals in information critical to mission success, domestic or foreign,” wrote Philip Jennings in an op-ed for USA Today. “But beyond that, her responses to being found out—dismissing its importance, claiming ignorance, blaming others—indict her beyond anything the investigation can reveal. Those elements reveal her character. And the saddest thing is so many Americans seem not to care.” (bolds are mine)
Mrs. Clinton said "she was looking forward to meeting with the FBI" about her server.
Of course, I'm "looking forward" to my next tooth extraction too!
Mrs. Clinton said "she was looking forward to meeting with the FBI" about her server.
Of course, I'm "looking forward" to my next tooth extraction too!
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
DEMOCRATS DOWN 7-MILLION VOTES
Via Gateway Pundit:
CONFIRMED=> Hillary Clinton Received 1.5 Million FEWER Votes in 2016 than in 2008 — Democrats Down 7 Million Votes
Jim Hoft Jun 8th, 2016 4:15 pm
Donald Trump had a tremendous primary season, setting new records for votes and turnout, while spending only a quarter of what Sanders and Clinton spent.
"He proved to be the real capitalist in the primary while Clinton and Sanders proved to be the socialists freely spending other people’s money." ~ Joe Hoft
Jim Hoft Jun 8th, 2016 4:15 pm
Donald Trump had a tremendous primary season, setting new records for votes and turnout, while spending only a quarter of what Sanders and Clinton spent.
"He proved to be the real capitalist in the primary while Clinton and Sanders proved to be the socialists freely spending other people’s money." ~ Joe Hoft
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)